Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/254807
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit

AutorFriedrich, O.; Porredon, A. CSIC ORCID CVN; Crocce, Martín CSIC ORCID; Fosalba, Pablo CSIC ORCID; Ávila, Santiago; García-Bellido, Juan CSIC ORCID; Gaztañaga, Enrique CSIC ORCID; Serrano, Santiago CSIC ORCID; Wilkinson, Reese D.; DES Collaboration
Palabras claveLarge-scale structure of the universe
Cosmology: observations
Fecha de publicación27-ago-2021
EditorOxford University Press
Royal Astronomical Society
CitaciónMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508(3): 3125-3165 (2021)
ResumenWe describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined two-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) data set. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing, we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of evaluating the model at a wrong set of parameters, the impact of masking and survey geometry, deviations from Poissonian shot noise, galaxy weighting schemes, and other sub-dominant effects. We find that our covariance model is robust and that its approximations have little impact on goodness of fit and parameter estimation. The largest impact on best-fitting figure-of-merit arises from the so-called fsky approximation for dealing with finite survey area, which on average increases the χ2 between maximum posterior model and measurement by 3.7 per cent (Δχ2 ≈ 18.9). Standard methods to go beyond this approximation fail for DES-Y3, but we derive an approximate scheme to deal with these features. For parameter estimation, our ignorance of the exact parameters at which to evaluate our covariance model causes the dominant effect. We find that it increases the scatter of maximum posterior values for Ωm and σ8 by about 3 per cent and for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter by about 5 per cent⁠.
DescripciónFriedrich, O., et al. DES Collaboration
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2384
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/254807
DOI10.1093/mnras/stab2384
E-ISSN1365-2966
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICE) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
DES_year_3_results.pdf3,61 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

58
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons