Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/254632
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Sensitivity of Skill Score Metric to Validate Lagrangian Simulations in Coastal Areas: Recommendations for Search and Rescue Applications

AutorRévelard, Adèle; Reyes, Emma; Mourre, Baptiste CSIC ORCID; Hernández Carrasco, Ismael CSIC ORCID; Rubio Icon, Anna; Lorente, Pablo; Lera Fernández, Christian De; Mader, Julien; Álvarez-Fanjul, Enrique; Tintoré, Joaquín CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveModel assessment
Search and rescue
Surface currents
Lagrangian trajectories
Drifters
High-frequency radar
Ibiza Channel
Fecha de publicación29-mar-2021
EditorFrontiers Media
CitaciónFrontiers in Marine Science 8:630388 (2021)
ResumenSearch and rescue (SAR) modeling applications, mostly based on Lagrangian tracking particle algorithms, rely on the accuracy of met-ocean forecast models. Skill assessment methods are therefore required to evaluate the performance of ocean models in predicting particle trajectories. The Skill Score (SS), based on the Normalized Cumulative Lagrangian Separation (NCLS) distance between simulated and satellite-tracked drifter trajectories, is a commonly used metric. However, its applicability in coastal areas, where most of the SAR incidents occur, is difficult and sometimes unfeasible, because of the high variability that characterizes the coastal dynamics and the lack of drifter observations. In this study, we assess the performance of four models available in the Ibiza Channel (Western Mediterranean Sea) and evaluate the applicability of the SS in such coastal risk-prone regions seeking for a functional implementation in the context of SAR operations. We analyze the SS sensitivity to different forecast horizons and examine the best way to quantify the average model performance, to avoid biased conclusions. Our results show that the SS increases with forecast time in most cases. At short forecast times (i.e., 6 h), the SS exhibits a much higher variability due to the short trajectory lengths observed compared to the separation distance obtained at timescales not properly resolved by the models. However, longer forecast times lead to the overestimation of the SS due to the high variability of the surface currents. Findings also show that the averaged SS, as originally defined, can be misleading because of the imposition of a lower limit value of zero. To properly evaluate the averaged skill of the models, a revision of its definition, the so-called SS∗, is recommended. Furthermore, whereas drifters only provide assessment along their drifting paths, we show that trajectories derived from high-frequency radar (HFR) effectively provide information about the spatial distribution of the model performance inside the HFR coverage. HFR-derived trajectories could therefore be used for complementing drifter observations. The SS is, on average, more favorable to coarser-resolution models because of the double-penalty error, whereas higher-resolution models show both very low and very high performance during the experiments.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.630388
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/254632
DOI10.3389/fmars.2021.630388
E-ISSN2296-7745
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMEDEA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Rescue_Applications.pdf6,45 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

49
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

46
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons