Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/254013
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Labels on seafood products in different European countries and their compliance to EU legislation

AuthorsPaolacci, Simona; Mendes, Rogério; Klapper, Regina; Velasco, Amaya CSIC; Ramilo-Fernández, Graciela CSIC ORCID CVN ; Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta; Potts, Tavis; Martins, Sandra; Avignon, Solene; Maguire, Julie; Paz, Enrique de; Johson, Martin; Denis, Françoise; Pardo, M. A.; McElligott, Dee; González Sotelo, Carmen CSIC ORCID
KeywordsSeafood labelling regulation
Seafood sustainability
Traceability
Marine resources
Scientific and commercial name
Fishing gear
Production method
Supermarkets
Fishmongers
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier
CitationMarine Policy 134: 104810 (2021)
AbstractThe increasing consumption of seafood products raises concerns over their sustainability and the conservation of marine resources. Seafood traceability, enabled by a regulated labelling system, is important to prevent overexploitation of these resources. The regulations (EU) No.1169/2011 and (EU) No 1379/2013 are the European legislative tools that specify the mandatory information that must be present on seafood labels. The present study analysed the labels of seafood products sold in different European countries in order to verify the presence of mandatory information required by EU regulations currently in place. The results show that there is a difference in compliance among groups of products and among countries. The country with the lowest level of compliance was The United Kingdom (still part of EU when the study was carried out), with an overall compliance of 63.7%. The country with the highest level of compliance was Portugal (87.2%). Across all the countries analysed, supermarkets were more compliant than fishmonger’s shops and Processed Prepacked products were more conformed best to the EU labelling legislation when compared to Unprocessed Non-Prepacked products. Differences among different areas of the same country were also observed. Fishing gear, scientific name, fishing/production method and date of freezing were the types of information most frequently missing on the labels examined. The results of this study pose the bases for further actions, that can be taken by relevant institutions, to improve compliance throughout the supply chain.
Description11 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables.-- Under a Creative Commons license
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104810
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/254013
ISSN0308-597X
ISMN10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104810
Appears in Collections:(IIM) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Labels_seafood_products_OA_2021.pdf1,97 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

Page view(s)

22
checked on May 21, 2022

Download(s)

47
checked on May 21, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.