Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/250049
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

The insoluble problems of books: what does Altmetric.com have to offer?

AutorTorres-Salinas, Daniel; Gorraiz, Juan; Robinson-García, Nicolás CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveBooks
Almetrics
Research evaluation
Databases
Library tools
Social sciences and humanities
Fecha de publicación2018
EditorEmerald Group Publishing
CitaciónAslib Journal of Information Management 70: 691-707 (2018)
Resumen[Purpose]: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX.
[Design/methodology/approach]: The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions, platform offers for books. The authors use two distinct data sets of books. On the one hand, the authors analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other hand, the authors use Clarivate’s Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com’s capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, the authors compare the findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX.
[Findings]: Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries, such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, the authors find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools.
[Practical implications]: This study targets different audience which can benefit from the findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool.
[Originality/value]: This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com’s functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0152
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/250049
DOI10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0152
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0152
issn: 2050-3806
Aparece en las colecciones: (INGENIO) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

58
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

10
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.