Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/24250
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Comparison of ionospheric tec obtained from Faraday rotation of geostationary satellite signals and from GPS data

Other TitlesComparación del tec obtenido a partir de la rotación Faraday de las señales de satélites geoestacionario y de los datos GPS
AuthorsSardón, E.; Jakowski, N.; Ruíz Armenteros, Antonio
KeywordsIonosfera
Sondeo eléctrico vertical
Radiocomunicación ionosférica
Radiocomunicación por satélite
Satélite geoestacionario
Receptores GPS
Global Positioning System
Issue Date1993
PublisherCSIC-UCM - Instituto de Astronomía y Geodesia (IAG)
CitationPublicación. Instituto de Astronomía y Geodesia, 185 : p. 14-18 (1993)
SeriesPublicación. Instituto de Astronomía y Geodesia
185
AbstractIn this paper we compare the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) obtained from Faraday rotation observations carried out at Neustrelitz (Germany), and the total electron content predicted for the same subionospheric points using Global Positioning System data gathered at Wettzell (Germany). Three different periods with data have been compared. In general, the same features for the TEC are reproduced by both results. For two of the compared periods there is a bias between both results, possibly due to the unknown initial polarization, the unresolved ambiguities in the Faraday-derived TEC or to plasmaspheric contributions. Another source of discrepancies between both results are deficiencies in the way of predicting the TEC at Neustrelitz using data from Wettzell.
DescriptionEn: Sardón, E., Rius, A., Zarraoa, N. GPS inospheric delays. Publicación. Instituto de Astronomía y Geodesia, nº 185, 1993.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/24250
ISSN0213-6198
Appears in Collections:(IAG) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
N185_1993_3.pdf1,45 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

Page view(s)

319
checked on Jan 19, 2022

Download(s)

219
checked on Jan 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.