English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/238742
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Lack of impact of protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations on the outcome of HIV-1-infected patients switching to darunavir-based dual therapy

AuthorsVizcarra, Pilar; Blanco, José L.; Montejano, Rocío; Negredo, Eugenia; Espinosa, Nuria; Casado Chocán, José Luis
KeywordsDual therapy
Raltegravir
Darunavir
Switching
Simplification
Resistance
Issue Date2020
PublisherTaylor & Francis
CitationInfectious Diseases 52(3): 202-206 (2020)
Abstract[Background]: Little is known about the impact of baseline resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the outcomes of alternative therapeutic strategies such as dual regimens. We assessed the efficacy of boosted darunavir plus raltegravir (DRV + RAL) dual regimen as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients with protease inhibitors RAMs.
[Methods]: Retrospective, multicentre study on the evolution of 228 heavily pretreated patients who switched to boosted DRV + RAL according to genotypic sensitivity score (GSS). Patients were classified as full susceptible (GSS = 2; n = 177), or with reduced darunavir susceptibility (GSS < 2; n = 51).
[Results]: Median (range) number of prior antiretroviral regimens was 9 (6–14), with a median (range) of 2 (1–3), 4 (3–6), and 5 (2–9) major mutations to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors, respectively. The median time of virological suppression before simplification was 49 months (IQR 39.8–63.5). Patients with reduced darunavir GSS showed a higher number of protease inhibitors-RAMs (9.3 vs 4.5, p < .01) and were suppressed for longer time (median, 61 months). At week 96, the rate of virological failure was low (two cases, 0.9%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.4–2.7%), and the efficacy, excluding non-virological reasons, was 96.8% (95%CI, 90.2–98.4%), without differences according to GSS or protease inhibitors-RAMs. Furthermore, significant improvements in CD4+ counts and CD4/CD8 ratio were observed (p < .01) in both groups.
[Conclusions]: Treatment simplification to a dual regimen of boosted DRV + RAL after long-term virological suppression was not associated with a high risk of treatment failure, even in patients harbouring protease inhibitors-resistant HIV infection.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2019.1694696
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/238742
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2019.1694696
ISSN2374-4235
E-ISSN2374-4243
Appears in Collections:(IBIS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.