Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/229606
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Internal variability versus multi‐physics uncertainty in a regional climate model |
Autor: | Lavín‐Gullón, Álvaro CSIC ORCID; Fernández, Jesús CSIC ORCID; Bastin, Sophie; Cardoso, Rita M.; Fita, L.; Giannaros, Theodore M.; Goergen, Klaus; Gutiérrez, José M. CSIC ORCID ; Kartsios, Stergios; Katragkou, Eleni; Lorenz, Torge; Milovac, Josipa CSIC ORCID; Soares, Pedro M. M.; Sobolowski, Stefan; Warrach-Sagi, Kirsten | Fecha de publicación: | 2020 | Editor: | Wiley-VCH | Citación: | International Journal of Climatology 41(S1): E656-E671 (2020) | Resumen: | In a recent study, Coppola et al. assessed the ability of an ensemble of convection‐permitting models (CPM) to simulate deep convection using three case studies. The ensemble exhibited strong discrepancies between models, which were attributed to various factors. In order to shed some light on the issue, we quantify in this article the uncertainty associated to different physical parameterizations from that of using different initial conditions, often referred to as the internal variability. For this purpose, we establish a framework to quantify both signals and we compare them for upper atmospheric circulation and near‐surface variables. The analysis is carried out in the context of the CORDEX Flagship Pilot Study on Convective phenomena at high resolution over Europe and the Mediterranean, in which the intermediate RCM WRF simulations that serve to drive the CPM are run several times with different parameterizations. For atmospheric circulation (geopotential height), the sensitivity induced by multi‐physics and the internal variability show comparable magnitudes and a similar spatial distribution pattern. For 2‐m temperature and 10‐m wind, the simulations with different parameterizations show larger differences than those launched with different initial conditions. The systematic effect over 1 year shows distinct patterns for the multi‐physics and the internal variability. Therefore, the general lesson of this study is that internal variability should be analysed in order to properly distinguish the impact of other sources of uncertainty, especially for short‐term sensitivity simulations. | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6717 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/229606 | DOI: | 10.1002/joc.6717 | E-ISSN: | 1097-0088 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IFCA) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 59,24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
16
checked on 11-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
checked on 23-feb-2024
Page view(s)
77
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
15
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.