Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22613
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

How the method of choice to assess liquid crystal tunable filters’bandpass function impacts the spectroradiometric measurements performed with them

AuthorsPeralta, Celia; Pons Aglio, Alicia CSIC ORCID; Campos Acosta, Joaquín CSIC ORCID CVN
KeywordsLiquid crystal tunable filter
Bandpass function
Multispectral imaging
Issue Date25-Nov-2009
PublisherInstitute of Physics Publishing
CitationJournal of Optics 12: 015707(2010)
AbstractMultispectral imaging systems and techniques have become powerful tools for the rapid measurement of high-spatial-resolution spectral images. Liquid crystal tunable filters (LCTF)attached to a monochrome CCD camera are being widely used as spectral analysis systems in different applications, particularly in colour imaging. Among these applications is the measurement of the spectral radiance profile of inhomogeneous sources. In such a system, uncertainty and resolution of the effective spectral distribution of the source mainly depend on that of the system’s responsivity as well as on that of the LCTF bandpass function. In the present work, the bandpass function of a liquid crystal tunable filter has been determined, using both the indirect method and the direct one. It has been demonstrated that the results yielded by either method are not equivalent, which implies that, when the bandpass function needs to be known with low uncertainty, this curve has to be measured by means of the direct method. Not only does the indirect method yield an erroneous bandpass function, but it also provides a different relation between the band’s central wavelength and the nominal wavelength. The effective radiance values that are obtained based on the direct method’s bandpass function can be up to 5% higher or 4% lower than those obtained from the indirect method’s bandpass function. The spectral variation of this discrepancy is oscillating, showing a higher amplitude for the lower wavelengths. This fact can make the measurement errors to be rather large for those radiation sources having narrow spectral distributions, such as lasers or LEDs.
Publisher version (URL)http://stacks.iop.org/JOpt/12/015707
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/22613
DOI10.1088/2040-8978/12/1/015707
Appears in Collections:(IFA) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on May 12, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on May 16, 2022

Page view(s)

289
checked on May 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.