Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/225873
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Comparing analytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater

AutorPérez-Cataluña, Alba CSIC ORCID; Cuevas Ferrando, Enric CSIC ORCID; Randazzo, Walter CSIC ORCID; Falcó, Irene CSIC ORCID; Allende, Ana CSIC ORCID ; Sánchez Moragas, Gloria CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveSARS-CoV-2
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus
Polyethylene glycol precipitation
Aluminum-based adsorption-precipitation
Wastewater based epidemiology
RT-qPCR
Fecha de publicación1-mar-2021
EditorElsevier BV
CitaciónScience of the Total Environment 758: 143870 (2021)
ResumenWastewater based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a reliable strategy to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Recent publications suggest that SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater is technically feasible; however, many different protocols are available and most of the methods applied have not been properly validated. To this end, different procedures to concentrate and extract inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and surrogates were initially evaluated. Urban wastewater seeded with gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and mengovirus (MgV) was used to test the concentration efficiency of an aluminum-based adsorption-precipitation method and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation protocol. Moreover, two different RNA extraction methods were compared in this study: a commercial manual spin column centrifugation kit and an automated protocol based on magnetic silica beads. Overall, the evaluated concentration methods did not impact the recovery of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 nor MgV, while extraction methods showed significant differences for PEDV. Mean recovery rates of 42.9 ± 9.5%, 27.5 ± 14.3% and 9.0 ± 2.2% were obtained for gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2, PEDV and MgV, respectively. Limits of detection (LoD95%) for five genomic SARS-CoV-2 targets (N1, N2, gene E, IP2 and IP4) ranged from 1.56 log genome equivalents (ge)/mL (N1) to 2.22 log ge/mL (IP4) when automated system was used; while values ranging between 2.08 (N1) and 2.34 (E) log ge/mL were observed when using column-based extraction method. Different targets were also evaluated in naturally contaminated wastewater samples with 91.2%, 85.3%, 70.6%, 79.4% and 73.5% positivity, for N1, N2, E, IP2 and IP4, respectively. Our benchmarked comparison study suggests that the aluminum precipitation method coupled with the automated nucleic extraction represents a method of acceptable sensitivity to provide readily results of interest for SARS-CoV-2 WBE surveillance.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143870
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/225873
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143870
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
Aparece en las colecciones: (PTI Salud Global) Colección Especial COVID-19
(CEBAS) Artículos
(IATA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Comparing analytical methods.pdf1,06 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

66
checked on 11-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

97
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

86
checked on 22-feb-2024

Page view(s)

165
checked on 21-abr-2024

Download(s)

453
checked on 21-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.