Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorNogales, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorQuilis, Vicente-
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Félix M.-
dc.contributor.authorMora, Juan L.-
dc.contributor.authorTrigo, Laura S.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-15T14:00:06Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-15T14:00:06Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: pp. 345-352 (2002)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0024-4066-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399-
dc.description.abstractWe have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank A. Valido for supplying data on fruit traits and who read an earlier version of the manuscript. F. Valdés gave technical assistance on performing seed viability tests and P. Jordano, D. Wenny, P. Moore, A. Traveset, J. Alonso and C. Nieves provided all kinds of advice. We specially thank the Armadas Española (Zona Marítima de Canarias) for transporting the researchers and the equipment to Alegranza.en_US
dc.format.extent115237 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectCanary Islandsen_US
dc.subjectFalcoen_US
dc.subjectGallotiaen_US
dc.subjectGerminationen_US
dc.subjectLaniusen_US
dc.subjectLyciumen_US
dc.subjectviabilityen_US
dc.titleAre predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?en_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.e-issn1095-8312-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IPNA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
BIJLS-2002-75-345.pdf112,54 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

612
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

342
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.