Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22278
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Trace metal availability in soils amended with metal-fixing inorganic materials

AuthorsMadrid Díaz, Fernando CSIC ORCID; Florido Fernández, M.C.; Madrid, Luis CSIC
KeywordsSoil trace metals
Availability
Bioaccessibility
Amendments
Principal component analysis
Issue Date19-Oct-2008
PublisherSpringer
CitationWater Air Soil Pollut 200: 15–24, (2009)
AbstractImmobilization of metals by two materials (zeolite, AZ, and a synthetic, carbonate-rich material, “slovakite”, SL) was tested in a pot experiment with two soils from urban areas of Sevilla and two soils affected by a mine spill. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. Hispanic) was grown in the pots, and metal contents were measured after 31 days in shoots and roots. Available metal was estimated by extraction with CaCl2 (readily soluble), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; plant available), a mixture of organic acids (soluble by root exudates), and glycine (bioaccessible by ingestion). Neither treatment caused significant differences on plant growth or metal contents of shoots, whereas roots contained more Cu in the SL treatments. Root Zn uptake was reduced in all cases, but reduction of Pb in roots was observed only in AZ treatments of the mine-spill soils. The effects on metal availability were often methoddependent. Decrease of CaCl2 data were observed only in the mine-spill soils. EDTA-soluble metals were clearly decreased by both materials. Bioaccessible Zn were decreased by either material in several cases (but not in the most heavily polluted soil), whereas Cu or Pb data were less conclusive.
Publisher version (URL)http://www.springerlink.com/content/074527134p429241
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/22278
DOI10.1007/s11270-008-9889-3
ISSN0049-6979
E-ISSN1573-2932
Appears in Collections:(IRNAS) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on May 19, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

301
checked on May 21, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.