English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/221415
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Consistent bear population DNA-based estimates regardless molecular markers type

AuthorsLópez-Bao, José V. ; Godinho, Raquel; Rocha, R. G.; Palomero, Guillermo; Blanco, Juan Carlos; Ballesteros, Fernando; Jiménez, José
KeywordsNon-invasive DNA monitoring
Population density estimates
Ursus arctos
Cantabrian brown bear
Spatial capture-recapture
Wildlife monitoring
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier
CitationBiological Conservation 248: 108651 (2020)
AbstractReliability of population size and density estimates is one of the most contentious issues when evaluating the conservation status of species. Non-invasive DNA monitoring, combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture approaches (SCR), is recurrently presented as a reliable procedure to achieve accurate, precise and feasible estimates. However, conservation practitioners frequently face the dilemma of which molecular marker type would perform better for their objectives. Here, using as case study the eastern subpopulation of the endangered Cantabrian brown bear, and the same dataset of non-invasive samples, we evaluated which molecular marker perform better (microsatellites vs. SNPs), and whether the selection of the marker could impact on estimates. Our results show similar posterior estimates for bear density and for the scale parameter, resulting in consistent population estimates, around 50 bears, regardless the molecular marker type selected, microsatellites: 48.4 (95%BCI = 33.8–67.3) or SNPs: 52.7 (95%BCI = 36.0–74.8). Using our dataset, we provide evidence for the importance of running several replicates for both microsatellites and SNPs when genotyping non-invasive samples, and how for the same number of molecular markers, microsatellites were statistically more powerful. The positive trend observed in small large carnivore populations requires the adaptation of monitoring approaches. The quality of indexes commonly used, such as the minimum annual counts of females with cubs of the year in our study case, may be more difficult to maintain over time as populations increase in size and range. We therefore recommend the implementation of a regular monitoring based on non-invasive DNA monitoring and SCR approaches.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108651
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/221415
DOI10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108651
ISSN0006-3207
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf59,24 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.