Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220525
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Income and Ecosystem Service Comparisons of Refined National and Agroforestry Accounting Frameworks: Application to Holm Oak Open Woodlands in Andalusia, Spain |
Autor: | Campos Palacín, Pablo CSIC ; Álvarez, Alejandro CSIC; Oviedo Pro, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Ovando Pol, Paola CSIC ORCID ; Mesa, Bruno CSIC; Caparrós Gass, Alejandro CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Total income Ecosystem accounting Environmental income Environmental asset National accounts Private amenity |
Fecha de publicación: | 7-feb-2020 | Editor: | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | Citación: | Forests 11(2): 185 (2020) | Resumen: | There is growing consensus regarding the implementation of a new statistical framework for environmental-economic accounting to improve ecosystem related policies. As the standard System of National Accounts (SNA) fails to measure the economic contribution of ecosystems to the total income of individuals, governments recognize the need to expand the standard SNA through the ongoing System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA). Based on the authors’ own data, this study focuses on linking 15 economic activities and 12 ecosystem services for a holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) open woodlands (HOW) ecosystem type in Andalusia, Spain. We emphasize that overcoming the challenges of multiple use is preferable to measuring single ecosystem products for improving habitat conservation policies. The objectives of this paper are to measure and compare the environmental assets, ecosystem services, and incomes at basic and social prices by applying a refined version of the standard System of National Accounts (rSNA) and the authors’ Agroforestry Accounting System (AAS), respectively, to HOW. Considering intermediate products and consumptions of HOW farmer and government activities, we find that the rSNA ecosystem services and environmental incomes at basic prices are 123.3 €/ha and −28.0 €/ha, respectively, while those of the AAS at social prices are 442.2 €/ha and 250.8 €/ha. Given advances in non-market valuation techniques, we show that an expanded definition of economic activities can be applied to measure the contribution to total income of managed natural areas taking into account the multiple uses of the ecosystem type. However, HOW sustainability continues to be a challenging issue that requires ecological threshold indicators to be identified, not only because of the economic implications but also because they provide vital information on which to base policy implementation. | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020185 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220525 | DOI: | 10.3390/f11020185 | E-ISSN: | 1999-4907 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CCHS-IPP) Artículos (ICMAN) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Income_and_Ecosystem_Service_Comparisons.pdf | 3,29 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on 16-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
checked on 25-feb-2024
Page view(s)
176
checked on 18-abr-2024
Download(s)
192
checked on 18-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons