Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220525
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Income and Ecosystem Service Comparisons of Refined National and Agroforestry Accounting Frameworks: Application to Holm Oak Open Woodlands in Andalusia, Spain

AutorCampos Palacín, Pablo CSIC ; Álvarez, Alejandro CSIC; Oviedo Pro, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Ovando Pol, Paola CSIC ORCID ; Mesa, Bruno CSIC; Caparrós Gass, Alejandro CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveTotal income
Ecosystem accounting
Environmental income
Environmental asset
National accounts
Private amenity
Fecha de publicación7-feb-2020
EditorMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitaciónForests 11(2): 185 (2020)
ResumenThere is growing consensus regarding the implementation of a new statistical framework for environmental-economic accounting to improve ecosystem related policies. As the standard System of National Accounts (SNA) fails to measure the economic contribution of ecosystems to the total income of individuals, governments recognize the need to expand the standard SNA through the ongoing System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA). Based on the authors’ own data, this study focuses on linking 15 economic activities and 12 ecosystem services for a holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) open woodlands (HOW) ecosystem type in Andalusia, Spain. We emphasize that overcoming the challenges of multiple use is preferable to measuring single ecosystem products for improving habitat conservation policies. The objectives of this paper are to measure and compare the environmental assets, ecosystem services, and incomes at basic and social prices by applying a refined version of the standard System of National Accounts (rSNA) and the authors’ Agroforestry Accounting System (AAS), respectively, to HOW. Considering intermediate products and consumptions of HOW farmer and government activities, we find that the rSNA ecosystem services and environmental incomes at basic prices are 123.3 €/ha and −28.0 €/ha, respectively, while those of the AAS at social prices are 442.2 €/ha and 250.8 €/ha. Given advances in non-market valuation techniques, we show that an expanded definition of economic activities can be applied to measure the contribution to total income of managed natural areas taking into account the multiple uses of the ecosystem type. However, HOW sustainability continues to be a challenging issue that requires ecological threshold indicators to be identified, not only because of the economic implications but also because they provide vital information on which to base policy implementation.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.3390/f11020185
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/220525
DOI10.3390/f11020185
E-ISSN1999-4907
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IPP) Artículos
(ICMAN) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Income_and_Ecosystem_Service_Comparisons.pdf3,29 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on 16-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

176
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

192
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons