English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/219651
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenneworth, Paules_ES
dc.contributor.authorOlmos Peñuela, Juliaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCastro Martínez, Elenaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T11:30:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-15T11:30:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-19-
dc.identifier.citationThe Third Research Evaluation in the SSH Conference - RESSH (2019)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/219651-
dc.descriptionTrabajo presentado en The Third Research Evaluation in the SSH Conference - RESSH 2019, celebrada en valencia del 19 al 20 de septiembre de 2019.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is an increasing interest in academic and policy communities on the societal impact of research in order to maximise the social benefits created by public investments in science (Muhonen et al., 2019). As part of that, it is becoming increasingly evaluated in an attempt to create the right incentives for scientists to steer academics to deliver this improved efficiency (Sivertsen, 2017). But those evaluation processes have raced ahead of the understandings of the way that research creates impact (Donovan, 2017). Bonaccorsi (2018) points out that this risks making a fairly fundamental epistemic error that fails to capture a diversity of working practices in different scientific disciplines that do not correspond to these common sense evaluation models used in policy and practice, such as in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) (see also Benneworth et al., 2016). This raises a prima facie case that societal impact evaluation of research might be producing adverse effects in the academy, that these problems might be being disproportionately borne by SSH: it is this problematic that we address in this paper.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the COST Action European Network on Research Evaluation of the Social Sciences and Humanities (CA15137). COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a pan-European intergovernmental framework. Its mission is to enable break-through scientific and technological developments leading to new concepts and products and thereby contribute to strengthening Europe’s research and innovation capacities.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.titleSteering effects of research evaluation on SSH early career researcherses_ES
dc.typecomunicación de congresoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000921es_ES
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Steering_Benneworth_ComCong2019.pdfAbstract272,82 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.