Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/218583
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Stem water potential-based regulated deficit irrigation scheduling for olive table trees

AutorCorell González, M.; Martín Palomo, Mª José; Girón Moreno, Ignacio F. CSIC ORCID; Andreu Cáceres, L.; Galindo Egea, A. CSIC ORCID; Centeno, Ana; Pérez-López, D.; Moriana, Alfonso CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveFruit drop
Fruit load
Fruit size
RDI
Water relations
Water stress level
Fecha de publicacióndic-2020
EditorElsevier
CitaciónAgricultural Water Management 242: 106418 (2020)
ResumenRegulated deficit irrigation (RDI) involves water stress management in different phenological periods throughout the season. Research in olive trees (oil production) suggested RDI during pit hardening based in pre-dawn and midday stem water potential (SWP) thresholds. However, the previous thresholds may not be extrapolated to table olive because fruit size, a very important feature in the table olive yield quality, is very sensitive to water stress. RDI in table olive deserve further research to determine the optimal water potential thresholds and the duration of the RDI periods for the specificity of the crop (low crop load to promote high fruit size). The aim of this work was to study different RDI schedules during pit hardening, considering different levels and durations of water stress. The experiment was performed in the 2015, 2016 and 2017 seasons, in a commercial mature table olive orchard (cv. Manzanilla) in Dos Hermanas (Seville, Spain). Control treatments were based on midday SWP measurement in order to optimize the water status with values around −1.4 MPa. Two RDI treatments were applied during pit hardening, dated (according to the changes in longitudinal fruit growth) from mid-June to the last week of August) to maintain water potential values around −2 MPa (RDI-1) and −3.5 MPa (RDI-3). Another RDI treatment (RDI-2) received irrigation to maintain values around −3.5 MPa but the recovery was performed at early July in order to obtain different durations of water stress. Irrigation strategies were evaluated with water relations measurements (soil moisture, gas exchange), fruit and shoot growth and quality and quantity yield indicators. Yield was not significantly affected in any of the RDI treatments with an ANOVA analysis. However, fruit drop estimated as the percentage of fruit lost only in the period of water deficit was related with water stress parameters (SWP and stress integral, IS). In addition, the relationship between fruits size and these latter parameters were significant and change according to yield level. Irrigation treatments did not affect next season yield because shoot growth and number of inflorescence at the beginning of each season were not different. RDI effect changed according to yield level, mainly in relation with fruit size. Data suggest that yield levels up to 12 t ha−1 were possible to manage RDI without affecting fruit size or reducing commercial quality. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Descripción12 páginas.- 13 figuras.- 2 tablas.- 41 referencias.-
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106418
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/218583
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106418
ISSN0378-3774
Aparece en las colecciones: (IRNAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on 18-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on 20-feb-2024

Page view(s)

229
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

86
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.