English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/218390
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrentin, Viniciuses_ES
dc.contributor.authorSilva Guerra, Rodrigo daes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLibrelotto, Giovani Rubertes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T10:49:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-21T10:49:51Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-02-
dc.identifier.citationXVI Latin American Robotics Symposium and VII Brazilian Robotics Symposium (LARS/SBR): 375 - 380 (2019)es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-7281-4268-5-
dc.identifier.issn2639-1775-
dc.identifier.other978-1-7281-4269-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/218390-
dc.description.abstractAutonomous vehicles (AVs) promise to bring many benefits to society, such as safety, an increase of accessibility and life quality, among others. Unlike humans, they do not get tired and, supposedly, do not fail. However, there might be cases where, due to limit visibility, occlusions or even a sensor failure, the system might not be capable to detect one or more obstacles along the vehicle's path early enough to avoid a crash. Although these situations might be rare if one considers a single vehicle, if predictions are correct, these AVs are to be adopted in large quantities in the near future, making even rare situations more commonplace. AVs will have to deal with these forced-choice situations in the best possible way. This paper presents a review of the ethical discussion regarding the matter of AVs and an analysis of a questionnaire implemented by the authors. Our results show evidence for several types of contradictory choices made by the subjects, which suggest the moral choices do not necessarily follow strict logical reasoning.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineerses_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPreprintes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectAutonomous vehicleses_ES
dc.subjectDecision-makinges_ES
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy processes_ES
dc.subjectEthicses_ES
dc.subjectAccidentses_ES
dc.subjectRobotses_ES
dc.titleContradictions in Assessing Human Morals and the Ethical Design of Autonomous Vehicleses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00072-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00072es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn2643-685X-
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.contributor.orcidTrentin, Vinicius [0000-0001-5732-3263]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidSilva Guerra, Rodrigo da [0000-0003-4011-0901]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidLibrelotto, Giovani Rubert [0000-0003-0570-5555]es_ES
Appears in Collections:(CAR) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Contradictions_in_assessing_human_morals.pdfArtículo principal204,13 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.