English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/217552
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPuigcorbé, Vienaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-González, Claraes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMasqué, Perees_ES
dc.contributor.authorGasol, Josep M.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T07:38:33Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T07:38:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Microbiology 11: 1645 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/217552-
dc.description10 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, supplementary material https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645/full#supplementary-material.-- Data Availability Statement. The raw sequence data have been deposited in the Figshare data repository, together with the non-rarefied OTU table, the taxonomy table and the environmental data used in this study, 10.6084/m9.figshare.12333107es_ES
dc.description.abstractMicrobes associated with sinking marine particles play key roles in carbon sequestration in the ocean. The sampling of particle-attached microorganisms is often done with sediment traps or by filtration of water collected with oceanographic bottles, both involving a certain time lapse between collection and processing of samples that may result in changes in particle-attached microbial communities. Conversely, in situ water filtration through submersible pumps allows a faster storage of sampled particles, but it has rarely been used to study the associated microbial communities and has never been compared to other particle-sampling methods in terms of the recovery of particle microbial diversity. Here we compared the prokaryotic communities attached to small (1–53 μm) and large (>53 μm) particles collected from the mesopelagic zone (100–300 m) of two Antarctic polynyas using in situ pumps (ISP) and oceanographic bottles (BTL). Each sampling method retrieved largely different particle-attached communities, suggesting that they capture different kinds of particles. These device-driven differences were greater for large particles than for small particles. Overall, the ISP recovered 1.5- to 3-fold more particle-attached bacterial taxa than the BTL, and different taxonomic groups were preferentially recovered by each method. In particular, typical particle-attached groups such as Planctomycetes and Deltaproteobacteria recovered with ISP were nearly absent from BTL samples. Our results suggest that the method used to sample marine particles has a strong influence in our view of their associated microbial communitieses_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipVP received funding from Edith Cowan University (G1003456) and from the School of Science at Edith Cowan University (G1003362) to support this work. CR-G and JG were supported by the grants CTM2015-70340-R and RTI2018-101025-B-I00 of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and by the Generalitat de Catalunya Consolidated Research Group 2017SGR/1568. PM acknowledges the support of the Generalitat de Catalunya (MERS 2017 SGR – 1588)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.relationMINECO/ICTI2013-2016/CTM2015-70340-Res_ES
dc.relationMICIU/ICTI2017-2020/RTI2018-101025-B-I00es_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectProkaryotic communitieses_ES
dc.subjectMarine particleses_ES
dc.subjectSize-fractionationes_ES
dc.subjectIn situ pumpses_ES
dc.subjectOceanographic bottleses_ES
dc.subjectPolynyases_ES
dc.titleSampling Device-Dependence of Prokaryotic Community Structure on Marine Particles: Higher Diversity Recovered by in situ Pumps Than by Oceanographic Bottleses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1664-302X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://www.frontiersin.org/about/open-accesses_ES
dc.contributor.funderEdith Cowan Universityes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat de Catalunyaes_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001798es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002809es_ES
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Puigcorbe_et_al_2020.pdf1,26 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Puigcorbe_et_al_2020_figure.pdf39,86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Puigcorbe_et_al_2020_Table.XLSX23,56 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.