English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/215622
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMirás-Avalos, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorRamírez-Cuesta, Juan Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorFandiño, María-
dc.contributor.authorCancela, J. J.-
dc.contributor.authorIntrigliolo, Diego S.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-30T16:26:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-30T16:26:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-02-
dc.identifier.citationSoil Systems 4(2): 19 (2020)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/215622-
dc.description© 2020 by the authors.-
dc.description.abstractWater erosion is a severe threat to soil resources, especially on cultivated lands, such as vineyards, which are extremely susceptible to soil losses. In this context, management practices aiming at reducing erosion risks must be favored. This current study aimed at estimating soil losses in two vineyards under Atlantic climatic conditions (Galicia, North West Spain). The capacity of two management practices for reducing soil erosion was tested and compared with tilled soil in the inter-rows: (i) application of mulching, and (ii) maintaining native vegetation. Soil losses were assessed using erosion pins and micro-plots. In addition, the improved stock unearthing method (ISUM) was employed in one of the vineyards to estimate soil remobilization since plantation. Soil loss rates in one of the vineyards were lower when soil was managed under mulching (0.36 Mg ha−1) and native vegetation (0.42 Mg ha−1), compared to tilled soil (0.84 Mg ha−1). Sediment losses measured in the second vineyard ranged between 0.21 and 0.69 Mg ha−1, depending on the treatment, but no clear conclusions could be drawn. Long-term soil loss, as estimated by ISUM, was of the same order of magnitude than that obtained by erosion pins and micro-plots. In both vineyards, soil loss rates were lower than those registered in Mediterranean vineyards, and were below the limit for sustainable erosion in Europe. Nevertheless, soil management practices alternative to tillage in the inter-row might reduce erosion risks under Atlantic climate conditions.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by Interreg Atlantic Area with European Regional Development Fund, grant number EAPA_272/2016 project Risk-AquaSoil.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher’s version-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCover crops-
dc.subjectMulching-
dc.subjectRunoff-
dc.subjectSoil erosion assessment-
dc.subjectSustainability-
dc.subjectTemperate climate-
dc.subjectVineyards-
dc.subjectVitis vinifera-
dc.titleAgronomic Practices for Reducing Soil Erosion in Hillside Vineyards under Atlantic Climatic Conditions (Galicia, Spain)-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4020019-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewed-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4020019-
dc.identifier.e-issn2571-8789-
dc.date.updated2020-06-30T16:26:48Z-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
(CEBAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Agronomic_Miras-Avalos_Art2020.pdf8,42 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.