English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/21430
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Título

In vitro study of the rumen and hingut fermentation of starch and cellulose

AutorRanilla, María José ; Carro Travieso, Mª Dolores ; Giráldez, Francisco Javier ; Mantecón, Ángel R.
Palabras claveFermentation
Rumen
Hindgut
Fecha de publicación2004
EditorEDP Sciences
Institut national de la recherche agronomique (France)
CitaciónReproduction, Nutrition, Development, 44 (Suppl. 1), S74 (2004)
ResumenThe ruminal and caecal contents from seven lambs fed a concentrate diet were used to study in vitro fermentation. Four hour incubations were performed without added substrate or with starch and cellulose. There were differences between ruminal and caecal fermentation for most of the studied parameters. Total VFA production and the Ac/Pr ratio were higher (P < 0.001) with caecal than with ruminal inocula in the absence of substrate (721 vs. 261 μmol and 3.65 vs. 2.64, for caecum and rumen, respectively). When starch was incubated with ruminal fluid, total VFA production almost doubled (P < 0.001) the one obtained with caecal contents (3048 vs. 1655 μmol, respectively). Fermentation pattern was also different for both inocula, with lower (P < 0.001) acetate and butyrate and higher (P < 0.001) propionate molar proportions with ruminal fluid when starch was incubated. Methane production was higher (P < 0.05) with ruminal than with caecal fluid (259 vs. 164 μmol, respectively) resulting in a higher (P < 0.01) hydrogen recovery. For cellulose, total VFA production and Ac/Pr ratio were higher (P < 0.01) in the caecal fermentation (697 vs. 320 μmol and 3.73 vs. 1.99, caecum vs. rumen). Molar proportions of the main VFA followed the same trend as with starch. Methane production was higher (P < 0.01) when cellulose was incubated with caecal contents (35.6 vs. 14.2 μmol, caecum vs. rumen), but hydrogen recovery was lower (P < 0.01) than that calculated for ruminal fluid. The results point to a high difference between rumen and hindgut fermentation when both inocula were used for in vitro incubations, showing that the first cannot serve as a model for the stoichiometry of the second.
DescripciónSpecial Issue: Fouth Joint INRA-RRI.-- Contributed to: Symposium Gut Microbiology (Clermont-Feerand, France, Jun 21-24, 2004).
Versión del editorhttp://rnd.edpsciences.org/
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/21430
ISSN0926-5287
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGM) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Pub327.pdf873,74 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.