English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/213731
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


The VALUE perfect predictor experiment: Evaluation of temporal variability

AuthorsMaraun, Douglas; Huth, R.; Gutiérrez, José M. ; San-Martín, Daniel; Dubovsky, Martin; Fischer, Andreas M.; Hertig, Elke; Soares, Pedro M. M.; Bartholy, Judith; Pongracz, Rita; Widmann, Martin; Casado, María Jesús; Ramos, Petra; Bedia, Joaquín
Issue Date2019
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationInternational Journal of Climatology 39(9): 3786-3818 (2019)
AbstractTemporal variability is an important feature of climate, comprising systematic variations such as the annual cycle, as well as residual temporal variations such as short-term variations, spells and variability from interannual to long-term trends. The EU-COST Action VALUE developed a comprehensive framework to evaluate downscaling methods. Here we present the evaluation of the perfect predictor experiment for temporal variability. Overall, the behaviour of the different approaches turned out to be as expected from their structure and implementation. The chosen regional climate model adds value to reanalysis data for most considered aspects, for all seasons and for both temperature and precipitation. Bias correction methods do not directly modify temporal variability apart from the annual cycle. However, wet day corrections substantially improve transition probabilities and spell length distributions, whereas interannual variability is in some cases deteriorated by quantile mapping. The performance of perfect prognosis (PP) statistical downscaling methods varies strongly from aspect to aspect and method to method, and depends strongly on the predictor choice. Unconditional weather generators tend to perform well for the aspects they have been calibrated for, but underrepresent long spells and interannual variability. Long-term temperature trends of the driving model are essentially unchanged by bias correction methods. If precipitation trends are not well simulated by the driving model, bias correction further deteriorates these trends. The performance of PP methods to simulate trends depends strongly on the chosen predictors.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5222
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/joc.5222
e-issn: 1097-0088
issn: 0899-8418
Appears in Collections:(IFCA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
valuevaria.pdf1,46 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.