English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/213001
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): An investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial

AuthorsCisneros, José Miguel; Rosso-Fernández, Clara; Roca-Oporto, Cristina; De Pascale, Gennaro; Jiménez-Jorge, Silvia; Fernández-Hinojosa, Esteban; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.; Ramírez, Paula; Ortiz Díaz-Miguel, Ramón; Estella, Á.; Antonelli, Massimo; Dimopoulos, George; Garnacho-Montero, Carmen
KeywordsColistin
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Multidrug-resistant bacteria
Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli
Issue Date2019
PublisherBioMed Central
CitationCritical Care 23: 383 (2019)
Abstract[Background]: Colistin is recommended in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with a high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB). However, the efficacy and safety of colistin are not well defined. [Methods]: A multicenter prospective randomized trial conducted in 32 European centers compared the efficacy and safety of colistin (4.5 million unit loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 3 million units every 8 h) versus meropenem (2 g every 8 h), both in combination with levofloxacin (500 mg every 12 h) for 7-14 days in patients with late VAP. Between May 2012 and October 2015, 232 patients were randomly assigned to the 2 treatment groups. The primary endpoint was mortality at 28 days after randomization in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population. Secondary outcomes included clinical and microbiological cure, renal function at the end of the treatment, and serious adverse events. The study was interrupted after the interim analysis due to excessive nephrotoxicity in the colistin group; therefore, the sample size was not achieved. [Results]: A total of 157 (67.7%) patients were included in the mMITT population, 36 of whom (22.9%) had VAP caused by CR-GNB. In the mMITT population, no significant difference in mortality between the colistin group (19/82, 23.2%) and the meropenem group (19/75, 25.3%) was observed, with a risk difference of - 2.16 (- 15.59 to 11.26, p = 0.377); the noninferiority of colistin was not demonstrated due to early termination and limited number of patients infected by carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Colistin plus levofloxacin increased the incidence of renal failure (40/120, 33.3%, versus 21/112, 18.8%; p = 0.012) and renal replacement therapy (11/120, 9.1%, versus 2/112, 1.8%; p = 0.015). [Conclusions]: This study did not demonstrate the noninferiority of colistin compared with meropenem, both combined with levofloxacin, in terms of efficacy in the empirical treatment of late VAP but demonstrated the greater nephrotoxicity of colistin. These findings do not support the empirical use of colistin for the treatment of late VAP due to early termination. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01292031. Registered 9 February 2011.
Description© The Author(s).
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/213001
DOI10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y
ISSN1364-8535
E-ISSN1466-609X
Appears in Collections:(IBIS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Colistin_Cisneros_Art2019.pdf1,18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.