English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/212924
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Soil-geomorphology relationships determine the distribution of the main subalpine grasslands in the Central Pyrenees (NE-Spain)

AuthorsBadía-Villas, D.; Buendía-García, L.; Longares Aladrén, Luis Alberto; Martí Dalmau, C.; Peña Monné, José Luis; González-Pérez, José Antonio ; Gómez García, Daniel
KeywordsCumulative levels
Nardus-mat grasslands
Soil formation
Soil classification
Late Holocene
Issue Date10-Sep-2020
PublisherElsevier
CitationScience of The Total Environment 734: 139121 (2020)
AbstractThe two most widely extended mountain grasslands in Europe (Nardus-mat grasslands and chalk grasslands) are distributed forming complex patterns. In the Ordesa and Monte Perdido National Park (Central Pyrenees, NE-Spain), they grow as secondary pastures within the treeline ecotone at the subalpine belt. This work aims to show the influence of soil properties on the spatial distribution of these pastures, under a dynamic geomorphology. Soils are sampled under both grasslands, which grow on different cumulative levels: Nardus-mat grasslands in the upper level (L1) and chalk grasslands in the lower level (L2). Soils in L1 have a significantly higher acidity, lower soluble ions and exchangeable calcium content than those in L2, reflecting a more intense leaching process, consistent with a longer period of slope stability. Qualitative differences are detected in the soil organic matter of the soil, using carbon and nitrogen isotopes, lighter in L2 soils than in L1 soils, due to a higher proportion of legumes growing in L2 (chalk grasslands). Soils in L1 and L2 shared many physical properties, such as a fine and homogeneous texture in the whole profile (silty clay or silty clay loam), and high aggregate stability and porosity in the topsoil. In contrast, the soils in L2 are shallower than in L1, which reduces their water-holding capacity. The soil is classified as Orthoeutric Cambisol (Clayic, Humic) in L1 but its rejuvenation, by gully erosion, transforms it into an Hypereutric Leptosol (Loamic, Ochric) in L2 (Typic Haplocryept and Lithic Haplocryept, respectively by Soil Taxonomy system). Definitely, the distribution of both grasslands for the studied area is linked to two cumulative levels of different ages, which in turn is strongy related to different soil properties.
Description13 páginas.- 10 figuras. - 1 tabla.- referencias.- Supplementary data to this article can be found online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139121
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139121
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/212924
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139121
ISSN0048-9697
E-ISSN1879-1026
Appears in Collections:(IPE) Artículos
(IRNAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Soil_geomorphology_relationships_determine_distribution_2020_Posprint.pdf Embargoed until September 10, 2022889,83 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.