English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/212391
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeardo, Pastora-
dc.contributor.authorOsman-García, Ignacio-
dc.contributor.authorSan José, Begoña-
dc.contributor.authorLlarena, Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorCongregado, Belén-
dc.contributor.authorCampá, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorMedina López, Rafael Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorExtramiana, Javier-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T16:02:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-27T16:02:49Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.02.008-
dc.identifiere-issn: 1872-6976-
dc.identifierissn: 0167-4943-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 82: 179- 85 (2019)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/212391-
dc.description.abstract[Background]: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are standard treatments for chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CN-mCRPC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications in elderly (≥ 75 years old) compared with young CN-mCRPC patients in a real-world clinical setting. Secondarily, we explored the survival prognostic value of different anatomo-clinical factors in elderly group. [Methods]: In this retrospective observational multicentre study, we included 134 consecutive CN-mCRPC patients, 64 young and 70 elderly men, who had received AA or Enz. [Results]: We did not find significant differences in treatment duration [16.6 months, (95% CI 9–24.2 months) vs. 16.8 months (95% CI: 6.3–27.2 months); p = 0.926] and overall survival [median not reached vs. 23.3 months (95% CI 10.2–36.3 months); p = 0.131] between the young and elderly groups. In elderly group, the only predictors of overall survival with AA or Enz were good ECOG performance status and high G8 score. Adverse events of grade ≥3 was similar in elderly group (12.9%) and in the young group (15.6%). Treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 6.3% of young group and 18.6% of elderly group. [Conclusions]: Effectiveness and safety of treatment of CN-mRCPC with Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide were similar in older and younger patients, although treatment discontinuation due to AEs was more frequent in the older age group. In addition to ECOG PS, assessment using specific geriatric scales as G8 screening tool could help to identify patients aged ≥75 who would most benefit from treatment with new-generation hormone therapy.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectElderly-
dc.subjectCastration resistant prostate cancer-
dc.subjectChemo-naive-
dc.subjectAbiraterone acetate-
dc.subjectEnzalutamide-
dc.subjectOverall survival-
dc.titleSafety and outcomes of new generation hormone-therapy in elderly chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients in the real world-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.02.008-
dc.date.updated2020-05-27T16:02:50Z-
dc.relation.csic-
Appears in Collections:(IBIS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.