English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/212283
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Identification of symbol digit modality test score extremes in Huntington's disease

AuthorsBraisch, Ulrike; Muche, Rainer; Rothenbacher, Dietrich; Landwehrmeyer, Georg Bernhard; Long, Jeffrey D.; Orth, Michael; Carrillo, Fátima; Cáceres-Redondo, María T.; Mir, Pablo ; Vargas, Laura; García-Moreno, José Manuel
KeywordsCOHORT
Cox hazard model
REGISTRY
Quantile regression
Symbol digit modalities test
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley-VCH
CitationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 180(3): 232-245 (2019)
AbstractStudying individuals with extreme phenotypes could facilitate the understanding of disease modification by genetic or environmental factors. Our aim was to identify Huntington's disease (HD) patients with extreme symbol digit modality test (SDMT) scores. We first examined in HD the contribution of cognitive measures of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) in predicting clinical endpoints. The language-independent SDMT was used to identify patients performing very well or very poorly relative to their CAG and age cohort. We used data from REGISTRY and COHORT observational study participants (5,603 HD participants with CAG repeats above 39 with 13,868 visits) and of 1,006 healthy volunteers (with 2,241 visits), included to identify natural aging and education effects on cognitive measures. Separate Cox proportional hazards models with CAG, age at study entry, education, sex, UHDRS total motor score and cognitive (SDMT, verbal fluency, Stroop tests) scores as covariates were used to predict clinical endpoints. Quantile regression for longitudinal language-independent SDMT data was used for boundary (2.5% and 97.5% quantiles) estimation and extreme score analyses stratified by age, education, and CAG repeat length. Ten percent of HD participants had an extreme SDMT phenotype for at least one visit. In contrast, only about 3% of participants were consistent SDMT extremes at two or more visits. The thresholds for the one-visit and two-visit extremes can be used to classify existing and new individuals. The identification of these phenotype extremes can be useful in the search for disease modifiers.
DescriptionREGISTRY Investigators of the European Huntington's Disease Network and COHORT Investigators of the Huntington Study Group.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32719
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/212283
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32719
issn: 1552-4841
e-issn: 1552-485X
Appears in Collections:(IBIS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.