English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/211273
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models

AuthorsCorrales, X. CSIC ORCID; Vilás González, Daniel; Piroddi, Chiara; Steenbeek, Jeroen ORCID; Claudet, Joachim; Calò, Antonio; Di Franco, Antonio; Font, Toni; Ligas, Alessandro; Prato, Giulia; Sahyoun, R.; Sartor, Paolo; Guidetti, P.; Coll, Marta CSIC ORCID
KeywordsNorthwestern Mediterranean sea
Ecopath model
Marine protected areas
Small-scale fisheries
Recreational fisheries
Ecological indicators
Issue DateAug-2020
CitationOcean and Coastal Management 193: 105232 (2020)
AbstractThe current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation and fisheries benefits. However, while there is a consensus about the ecological benefits whether such types of MPAs can really provide both benefits is still uncertain. Here, we analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs (Cerbère-Banyuls, Cap de Creus and Medes Islands) using a comparative temporal ecosystem modelling approach to assess their effectiveness over time in recovering marine resources and ecosystem in the area. Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs, potentially driven by MPA design, management and implementation features. Temporal increases of benefits were small, whenever detected, and showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators, mostly in Cerbère-Banyuls and Medes Islands MPAs. Our results confirm the benefits of protection to coastal marine resources and ecosystems when MPAs are enforced but highlight the current limitations of the three MPAs due to their small size and the significant impacts of small-scale and recreational fisheries. This study illustrates the capability to evaluate protection effects of small multi-zone MPAs with an ecosystem modelling perspective and represents the baseline to develop future scenarios of alternative management options to foster ecosystem recovery and resource rebuilding in the studied MPAs
Description12 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables, 1 appendix supplementary data https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232
Identifiersissn: 0964-5691
e-issn: 1873-524X
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Corrales_et_al_2020_preprint.pdf267,71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Corrales_et_al_whole_MPAs_Figures.docx997,12 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Corrales_et_al_whole_MPAs_Tables.docx26,93 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_1_EwE_theory.docx22,21 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_2_Input_data_Ecopath_whole_MPA.docx230,01 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_3_Import_Pedigree_and_PREBAL.docx574,01 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_4_Diet_MPA_models.xlsx459,49 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
SOM_5_Input_data_Ecosim_whole_MPA.docx46 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_6_Fitting_Banyuls_Cerbere.docx82,96 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_7_Fitting_Cap_de_Creus.docx487,87 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
SOM_8_Fitting_Medes_Islands.docx291,23 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
parte 1.16,45 kBUnknownView/Open
parte 1.2.115,14 kBUnknownView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.