Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/210750
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Does a Country/Region's Economic Status Affect Its Universities' Presence in International Rankings?

AutorFernandez Tuesta, Esteban; Garcia Zorita, Carlos; Romera Ayllon, Rosario; Sanz-Casado, Elías CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveAcademic Ranking of World Universities
Socio-economic indicators
Regression analysis
Fecha de publicación2019
EditorChinese Academy of Sciences
CitaciónJournal of Data and Information Science 4(2): 56-78 (2019)
ResumenPurpose: Study how economic parameters affect positions in the Academic Ranking of World Universities' top 500 published by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Graduate School of Education in countries/regions with listed higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used capitalises on the multi-variate characteristics of the data analysed. The multi-colinearity problem posed is solved by running principal components prior to regression analysis, using both classical (OLS) and robust (Huber and Tukey) methods. Findings: Our results revealed that countries/regions with long ranking traditions are highly competitive. Findings also showed that some countries/regions such as Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, and Italy, had a larger number of universities in the top positions than predicted by the regression model. In contrast, for Japan, a country where social and economic performance is high, the number of ARWU universities projected by the model was much larger than the actual figure. In much the same vein, countries/regions that invest heavily in education, such as Japan and Denmark, had lower than expected results. Research limitations: Using data from only one ranking is a limitation of this study, but the methodology used could be useful to other global rankings. Practical implications: The results provide good insights for policy makers. They indicate the existence of a relationship between research output and the number of universities per million inhabitants. Countries/regions, which have historically prioritised higher education, exhibited highest values for indicators that compose the rankings methodology; furthermore, minimum increase in welfare indicators could exhibited significant rises in the presence of their universities on the rankings. Originality/value: This study is well defined and the result answers important questions about characteristics of countries/regions and their higher education system.
DescripciónEste artículo está sujeto a una licencia CC BY 4.0
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0009
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/210750
DOI10.2478/jdis-2019-0009
ISSN2096-157X
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IFS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
country_regions.pdf1,86 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on 29-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 20-feb-2024

Page view(s)

152
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

120
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons