English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/210739
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Comparison of different approaches for optimizing nitrogen management in sprinkler-irrigated maize

AuthorsIsla Climente, Ramón ; Valentín-Madrón, Francisco; Maturano, M.; Aibar, Joaquín; Guillén, Mónica ; Quílez Sáez de Viteri, Dolores
KeywordsNitrogen use efficiency
Chlorophyll meter
Soil testing
Diffuse pollution
Issue DateMay-2020
PublisherElsevier
CitationIsla R, Valentín-Madrón F, Maturano M, Aibar J, Guillén M, Quílez D. Comparison of different approaches for optimizing nitrogen management in sprinkler-irrigated maize. European Journal of Agronomy 116: 126043 (2020)
AbstractThe gap between scientifically sound nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rates and the actual rates used by farmers in maize is still significant. The improvement of nitrogen use efficiency in such a highly N-demanding crop is necessary to decrease the negative effects of N fertilization. The objective was to compare the performance of different N management treatments in maize grown under semiarid Mediterranean sprinkler-irrigated conditions to the standard farmer practice. We compared an agronomically sound fixed rate of N fertilizer (FR) with a variable N rate obtained based on a soil mineral balance at pre-planting (SB) or based on a portable chlorophyll meter readings (CM) made just before tasseling. Additional treatments were a N control, without fertilizer (T0), and a non-limiting N (NL) treatment wich was typical of the current farmer practice. The study was replicated at 5 sites in one-year experiments and under 3 pre-planting soil mineral nitrogen environments (SMN, Low, Medium, and High). The results demonstrate the potential to reduce N rates from zero to 236 kg N ha−1 compared to the NL in irrigated maize fields without compromising yields in most of the situations with a subsequent increase of NUE. Averaging over sites, the use of fine-tuning N fertilizer strategies that considered field-specific conditions (SB and CM) reduced N rates (38 %) compared to the reductions under the FR strategy (26 %) relative to the NL conditions, which is the treatment closest to a typical farmer`s application rate.
Description40 Pags.- 6 Tabls.- 5 Figs.- Suppl. Data. The definitive version is available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11610301
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126043
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/210739
DOI10.1016/j.eja.2020.126043
ISSN1161-0301
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
QuilezD_JEuropAgron_2020.pdf Embargoed until June 1, 2022491,76 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.