English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/208977
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

The Gaia-ESO survey: Matching chemodynamical simulations to observations of the Milky Way

AuthorsThompson, B. B.; Few, C. G.; Bergemann, M.; Gibson, B. K.; MacFarlane, B. A.; Serenelli, A. ; Gilmore, G.; Randich, S.; Vallenari, A.; Alfaro, Emilio J. ; Bensby, T.; Francois, P.; Korn, A. J.; Bayo, A.; Carraro, G.; Casey, A. R.; Costado, M. T. ; Donati, P.; Franciosini, E.; Frasca, A.; Hourihane, A.; Jofrè, P.; Hill, V.; Heiter, U.; Koposov, S. E.; Lanzafame, A.; Lardo, C.; de Laverny, P.; Lewis, J.; Magrini, L.; Marconi, G.; Masseron, T.; Monaco, L.; Morbidelli, L.; Pancino, E.; Prisinzano, L.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Sacco, G.; Sousa, S. G.; Tautvaišiene, G.; Worley, C. C.; Zaggia, S.
KeywordsGalaxies: evolution
Galaxies: formation
Galaxy: abundances
Methods: numerical
Issue Date2018
PublisherOxford University Press
CitationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473: 185-197 (2018)
AbstractThe typical methodology for comparing simulated galaxies with observational surveys is usually to apply a spatial selection to the simulation to mimic the region of interest covered by a comparable observational survey sample. In this work, we compare this approach with a more sophisticated post-processing in which the observational uncertainties and selection effects (photometric, surface gravity and effective temperature) are taken into account. We compare a 'solar neighbourhood analogue' region in a model MilkyWay-like galaxy simulated with RAMSES-CH with fourth release Gaia-ESO survey data. We find that a simple spatial cut alone is insufficient and that the observational uncertainties must be accounted for in the comparison. This is particularly true when the scale of uncertainty is large compared to the dynamic range of the data, e.g. in our comparison, the [Mg/Fe] distribution is affected much more than the more accurately determined [Fe/H] distribution. Despite clear differences in the underlying distributions of elemental abundances between simulation and observation, incorporating scatter to our simulation results to mimic observational uncertainty produces reasonable agreement. The quite complete nature of the Gaia-ESO survey means that the selection function has minimal impact on the distribution of observed age and metal abundances but this would become increasingly more important for surveys with narrower selection functions.© 2017 The Author(s).
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/MNRAS/STX2316
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/208977
Identifiersdoi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STX2316
issn: 1365-2966
Appears in Collections:(ICE) Artículos
(IAA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IAA_2018stx2316.pdf1,41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.