English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/205834
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Building a taxonomy of eco-innovation types in firms. A quantitative perspective

AuthorsKiefer, Christoph P.; Carrillo Hermosilla, Javier; Río González, Pablo del
KeywordsEco-innovation
Cluster analyses
Spain
Small and medium-size
enterprises
Circular economy
Issue Date2019
PublisherElsevier
CitationResources Conservation and Recycling volume (145): 339-348 (2019)
Abstract[EN] Eco-innovations, or innovations that reduce the environmental impacts of production and consumption activities, are considered crucial for sustainability transitions and a key element of a Circular Economy. Although previous contributions have acknowledged the existence of different types of eco-innovations (e.g., product vs. service or incremental vs. radical), a precise conceptualization of eco-innovation types, which takes into account its multifaceted character, is missing. Yet such a conceptualization is crucial in order to understand how eco-innovations contribute to a sustainable transition, how policy makers can promote different eco-innovation types, and how business practitioners can develop eco-innovations. This article covers this gap in the literature. Its aim is twofold: 1) to develop a quantitative method to categorise different eco-innovation types in a particular setting, taking into account their distinct features and dimensions; 2) to apply this method in a given sector and country, building a taxonomy of eco-innovation types. It draws on a survey of 197 Spanish industrial small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) which developed or adopted an eco-innovation between 2012 and 2013. The statistical analyses reveal the existence of a taxonomy of five eco-innovation types: systemic, externally driven, continuous improvement, radical (technology-push initiated) and eco-efficient. They differ in their techno-economic configurations, contribution to environmental sustainability and corporate goals and required changes in the firms. Specific policy and managerial implications are deducted.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.021
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/205834
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.021
issn: 1879-0658
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IPP) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.