English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/204757
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity

AuthorsCorradi, Guido; Chuquichambi, Erick G.; Barrada, Juan Ramón; Clemente, Ana; Nadal, Marcos
Keywordsaesthetic sensitivity
balance
complexity
contour
curvature
symmetry
Issue Date2020
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationBritish Journal of Psychology (2020)
AbstractAesthetic sensitivity has been defined as the ability to recognize and appreciate beauty and compositional excellence, and to judge artistic merit according to standards of aesthetic value. The Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (VAST) has often been used to assess this ability, but recent research has revealed it has several psychometric problems. Such problems are not easily remedied, because they reflect flawed assumptions inherent to the concept of aesthetic sensitivity as traditionally understood, and to the VAST itself. We introduce a new conception of aesthetic sensitivity defined as the extent to which someone's aesthetic valuation is influenced by a given feature. Experiment 1 aimed to characterize aesthetic sensitivity to four prominent features in visual aesthetics: complexity, symmetry, contour, and balance. Experiment 2 aimed to replicate the findings of Experiment 1 and to assess the test–retest reliability of an instrument designed to measure aesthetic sensitivity to these features using an abridged set of stimuli. Our results reveal that people differ remarkably in the extent to which visual features influence their liking, highlighting the crucial role of individual variation when modelling aesthetic preferences. We did not find clear relations between the four measures of aesthetic sensitivity and personality, intelligence, and art interest and knowledge. Finally, our measurement instrument exhibited an adequate-to-good test–retest reliability.
Publisher version (URL)http://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12427
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/204757
DOI10.1111/bjop.12427
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/bjop.12427
e-issn: 2044-8295
issn: 0007-1269
Appears in Collections:(IFISC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.