English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/204288
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Implications of using different metrics for niche analysis in ecological communities

AuthorsGouraguine, Adam; Melián, Carlos J. ; Reñones, Olga; Hinz, Hilmar ; Baxter, Heather; Cardona, Luis; Moranta, Joan
KeywordsRealised niche
Niche variability
Standard ellipse area
Total area of the convex hull
Algal reefs
Coral reefs
Teleostei
Issue Date2019
PublisherInter Research
CitationMarine Ecology Progress Series 630: 1-12 (2019)
AbstractExplaining the mechanisms driving niche partitioning among species is of great importance in ecology. Unlike the fundamental niche, a species' realised niche can only be measured in situ, as a result of biotic and abiotic interactions defining its size. Following current methodology, the realised niche of a species is often influenced by the rare and divergent individuals of the community sampled. In this study, using fish on coral and temperate reefs as an example, behavioural empirical data were collected to estimate realised niche sizes and niche overlaps. Niche measurements were made using the total area of the convex hull (TA), but as an alternative, a metric not as strongly influenced by sample size, standard ellipse area (SEA), was also used. A comprehensive description is given, and contextdependent pros and cons of using both metrics are discussed. Additionally, an alternative sample size correction was presented for both metrics. The analyses re vealed large differences in the sizes of realised niches and their overlaps between species depending on the measurement metric used. Regardless of the species, niche size and overlap were always larger for TA than SEA. Increasing sample size re - duced niche size variability for both TA and SEA, but the variation was always smaller for SEA than TA. We successfully adapted the SEA metric for analysis of behavioural niche components and demonstrated that measuring niche sizes using the 2 metrics, each with their own strengths and weaknesses, can produce contradictory results, the ecological consequences of which are likely to be important.
Publisher version (URL)http://doi.org/10.3354/meps13154
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/204288
DOI10.3354/meps13154
ISSN0171-8630
E-ISSN1616-1599
Appears in Collections:(IMEDEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.