English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/202259
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Difficulties to identify global and local key biodiversity areas in diverse and isolated marine jurisdictions

AuthorsRiera, Rodrigo; Delgado, Juan D.; Moro, Leopoldo; Herrera, Rogelio; Becerro, Mikel
KeywordsKey biodiversity areas
Conservation
IUCN red list
Population
Endangered
Endemism
Canary Islands
Atlantic Ocean
Issue Date2020
PublisherSpringer
CitationJournal of Coastal Conservation 24 : 13 (2020)
AbstractBiodiversity conservation requires efficient methods to be integrated into environmental management planning. The Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) approach has been recently developed for identifying sites of greatest conservation importance. They are regarded as priorities for management intervention and for identifying investment priorities. While the KBA approach has been extensively used to identify locations of high biodiversity significance in the terrestrial realm, this methodology is scarcely known by stakeholders in marine jurisdictions. Identification of a network of KBA sites should be regarded as a high priority in diverse and isolated areas, such as oceanic islands. In the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean), a number of KBA sites are here identified across the archipelago using irreplaceability and vulnerability criteria to safeguard populations of threatened marine species. If global standards associated with the IUCN Red List are considered, only nesting beaches and regular feeding grounds of sea turtles (Caretta caretta and Chelonia mydas) qualify as KBAs. However, this approach overlooks most of the biodiversity hotspots in the Canary archipelago that include representative ecosystems of volcanic islands (e.g. marine caves) or habitats with high conservation importance in terms of productivity, regional rarity and diversity (e.g. seagrass meadows and maërl seabeds), as well as presence of locally threatened species.
DescriptionEste artículo contiene 9 páginas, 2 figuras, 2 tablas.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00732-0
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/202259
ISSN1400-0350
E-ISSN1874-7841
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.