English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/201961
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment

AuthorsKlijn, Flip ; Pais, Joana; Vorsatz, Marc
KeywordsDynamic school choice
Deferred acceptance
Stability
Efficiency
Issue DateJan-2019
PublisherElsevier BV
CitationGames and Economic Behavior 113: 147-163 (2019)
AbstractIn the context of school choice, we experimentally study how behavior and outcomes are affected when, instead of submitting rankings in the student-proposing or school-proposing deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism, students make decisions dynamically, going through the steps of the underlying algorithms. Our main results show that, contrary to theory, (a) in the dynamic student-proposing DA mechanism, students propose to schools respecting the order of their true preferences slightly more often than in its static version while, (b) in the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism, students react to proposals by always respecting the order and not accepting schools in the tail of their true preferences more often than in the corresponding static version. As a consequence, the dynamic mechanisms outperform their static counterparts in what stability and average payoffs are concerned. In the aggregate, the dynamic school-proposing DA mechanism is the best performing mechanism.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.009
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/201961
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.009
issn: 1090-2473
issn: 0899-8256
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
F.Klijn Games and Economic Behavior.pdf Embargoed until September 19, 2020669,27 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.