English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/201732
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Fitness benefits and costs of floral advertising traits: insights from rayed and rayless phenotypes of Anacyclus (Asteraceae)

AuthorsCerca, J.; Agudo, Alicia B.; Castro, S. ; Afonso, A.; Alvarez, I.; Torices, R.
Issue Date2019
PublisherBotanical Society of America
CitationAmerican Journal of Botany 106: 231- 243 (2019)
AbstractPremise of the Study: Ray flowers commonly observed in daisies’ flowering heads are a well-known example of advertising structures for enhancing pollinator attraction. Despite this, ray loss has occurred in multiple lineages, which still rely on pollinators, suggesting that rayless phenotypes could also be adaptive for animal-pollination. Here, we investigate the benefits and costs of these specialized floral advertising structures by comparing rayed and rayless phenotypes in two hybridizing closely related species. Methods: We assessed the advantages and costs of ray production in terms of floral visitor's attraction, pollen limitation, and female reproductive success using the broad natural variation on ray size and number at the contact zone of A. clavatus (rayed) and A. valentinus (rayless). In addition, we experimentally explored the effect of rays under controlled neighborhoods and the effect of ray removal on fruit production. Key Results: In sympatry, rayed phenotypes attracted significantly more visitors than rayless plants, in which seed production was pollen limited. However, rayed phenotypes did not show higher fruit set or seed production than rayless phenotypes. Fruit set and seed production benefited from denser neighborhood displays and larger individual floral displays, respectively. The removal of ray florets did not appear to enable resource reallocation to fruit production. Conclusions: Rayless heads compensated their lower visitation rate by means of a higher number of flowers per head achieving similar fecundity levels to rayed plants. The larger size of rayless heads might thus indicate an inflorescence-level trade-off between attraction and fertility.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1238
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/201732
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1238
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/ajb2.1238
issn: 0002-9122
Appears in Collections:(EEZA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cerca et al 2019 Postprint AmJBot.pdf8,78 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
AppendixS1.docx47,22 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS2.docx25,83 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS3.docx24,81 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS4.docx191,76 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS5.docx23,18 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS6.docx58,48 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS7.docx38,81 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS8.docx22,67 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
AppendixS9.docx68,79 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.