English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/201578
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review

AuthorsLozano, Jorge; Olszanska, Agnieszka; Morales-Reyes, Zebensui; Castro, Antonio A.; Malo, Aurelio F.; Moleón, Marcos; Sánchez-Zapata, José A.; Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara ; von Wehrden, Henrik; Dorresteijn, Ine; Kansky, Ruth; Fischer, Joern; Martín-López, Berta
KeywordsCarnivore conservation
Ecosystem services
Human-wildlife conflicts
Interdisciplinary research
Nature's contributions to people
Social-ecological relations
Issue DateSep-2019
CitationBiological Conservation 237: 480-492 (2019)
AbstractWe conducted a systematic review of 502 articles, published between 2000 and 2016, to characterize the research on human-carnivore relations according to (i) temporal and geographical distribution, (ii) biology, (iii) relations between carnivores and humans, (iv) social actors, (v) drivers of change, (vi) management, and (vii) applied methods. We performed a detrended correspondence analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests to identify and describe thematic clusters used in human-carnivore relations research. Our results show that research is deeply biased so far, and four important knowledge gaps were detected. First, we found more studies had been conducted in the Global North than in the Global South, although risks and benefits of living alongside carnivores exist in the Global South equally. Second, most research focused on large predators, while small and medium-sized carnivores are also source of damages and ecosystem services. Third, relations were often framed around conflicts, with little attention to possible ecosystem services. Fourth, most research was carried out using natural sciences methods, despite methods from the social sciences having much to offer in this context. Research fell into seven thematic clusters focusing on: (1) North-American bears, (2) African large carnivores, (3) social research in America, (4) meso-carnivores, (5) Asian felids, (6) conflicts with the grey wolf, and (7) damages to human property. These results highlight the need for more integrative, social-ecological research on human-carnivore relations. We discuss how addressing existing knowledge gaps could contribute to mitigating conflicts as well as fostering coexistence between humans and carnivore species.
Publisher version (URL)http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002
Appears in Collections:(IMEDEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Human-carnivore_relations.docx112,57 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Figure 1.tiff2,15 MBTIFFThumbnail
Figure 2.tif437,74 kBTIFFThumbnail
Figure 3.tiff621,64 kBTIFFThumbnail
Figure 4.tif404,02 kBTIFFThumbnail
Figure 5.tif593,28 kBTIFFThumbnail
Title_Page.docx13,84 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.