English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/200581
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Boosting the traditional physiotherapist approach for stroke spasticity using a sensorized ankle foot orthosis: A pilot study

AuthorsTamburella, Federica; Moreno, Juan Camilo CSIC ORCID ; Iosa, Marco; Pisotta, Iolanda; Cincotti, Febo; Mattia, Donatella; Pons Rovira, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Molinari, Marco
KeywordsStroke
Spasticity
Rehabilitation
Biomechanical
Biofeedback
Human-to-human interaction
Issue Date2017
PublisherTaylor & Francis
CitationTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation 24(6): 447-456 (2017)
Abstract[Background]: Spasticity is a motor disorder that is commonly treated manually by a physical therapist (PhT) stretching the muscles. Recent data on learning have demonstrated the importance of human-to-human interaction in improving rehabilitation: cooperative motor behavior engages specific areas of the motor system compared with execution of a task alone.
[Objectives]: We hypothesize that PhT-guided therapy that involves active collaboration with the patient (Pt) through shared biomechanical visual biofeedback (vBFB) positively impacts learning and performance by the Pt during ankle spasticity treatment. A sensorized ankle foot orthosis (AFO) was developed to provide online quantitative data of joint range of motion (ROM), angular velocity, and electromyographic activity to the PhT and Pt during the treatment of ankle spasticity.
[Methods]: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Ten subacute stroke inpatients, randomized into experimental (EXP) and control (CTRL) groups, underwent six weeks of daily treatment. The EXP group was treated with an active AFO, and the CTRL group was given an inactive AFO. Spasticity, ankle ROM, ankle active and passive joint speed, and coactivation index (CI) were assessed at enrollment and after 15–30 sessions.
[Results]: Spasticity and CI (p < 0.005) decreased significantly after training only in the EXP group, in association with a significant rise in active joint speed and active ROM (p < 0.05). Improvements in spasticity (p < 0.05), active joint speed (p < 0.001), and CI (p < 0.001) after treatment differed between the EXP and CTRL groups.
[Conclusions]: PhT–Pt sharing of exercise information, provided by joint sensorization and vBFB, improved the efficacy of the conventional approach for treating ankle spasticity in subacute stroke Pts.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1318340
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/200581
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1318340
ISSN1074-9357
E-ISSN1945-5119
Appears in Collections:(IC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.