English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/198649
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial

AuthorsLongo-Muñoz, F.; Argiles, G.; Tabernero, J.; Cervantes, A.; Gravalos, C.; Pericay, C.; Gil-Calle, S.; Mizuguchi, H.; Carrato-Mena, A.; Limón, María L.; García-Carbonero, Rocío CSIC ORCID
KeywordsTAS-102
Metastatic colorectal cancer
Trifluridine
Tipiracil hydrochloride
Fluoropyrimidine
Spain
Issue DateFeb-2017
PublisherSpringer Nature
CitationClinical and Translational Oncology 19(2): 227-235 (2017)
Abstract[Purpose] TAS-102 is a combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analog trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil. Efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory or intolerant to standard therapies were evaluated in the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. Results of RECOURSE demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with TAS-102 versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 and 0.48 for OS and PFS, respectively; both P < 0.001]. The current analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup.
[Methods] Primary and key secondary endpoints were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, using univariate and multivariate analyses. Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics.
[Results] The RECOURSE Spanish subgroup included 112 patients (mean age 61 years, 62 % male). Median OS was 6.8 months in the TAS-102 group (n = 80) versus 4.6 months in the placebo group (n = 32) [HR = 0.47; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.28–0.78; P = 0.0032). Median PFS was 2.0 months in the TAS-102 group and 1.7 months in the placebo group (HR = 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.30–0.74; P = 0.001). Eighty (100 %) TAS-102 versus 31 (96.9 %) placebo patients had adverse events (AEs). The most common drug-related ≥Grade 3 AE was neutropenia (40 % TAS-102 versus 0 % placebo). There was 1 (1.3 %) case of febrile neutropenia in the TAS-102 group versus none in the placebo group.
[Conclusions] In the RECOURSE Spanish subgroup, TAS-102 was associated with significantly improved OS and PFS versus placebo, consistent with the overall RECOURSE population. No new safety signals were identified.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/198649
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7
Identifiersdoi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7
issn: 1699-048X
e-issn: 1699-3055
Appears in Collections:(IBIS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
analysis_phase_3.pdf1,02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.