English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/196992
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShafer, Aaron B. A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Jochen B. W.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Paulo C.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBergstrom, Linneaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorColling, Guyes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDalén, Lovees_ES
dc.contributor.authorMeester, Luc Dees_ES
dc.contributor.authorEkblom, Robertes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFior, Simonees_ES
dc.contributor.authorHajibabaei, Mehrdades_ES
dc.contributor.authorHoezel, A. Ruses_ES
dc.contributor.authorHoglund, Jacobes_ES
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Evelyn J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorKrützen, Michaeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Anita J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorÖsterling, E. Martines_ES
dc.contributor.authorOuborg, N. Joobes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPiccolo, Johnes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPrimmer, Craig R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorReed, Floyd A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRoumet, Mariees_ES
dc.contributor.authorSalmona, Jordies_ES
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Michael K.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSegelbacher, Gernotes_ES
dc.contributor.authorThaulow, Jenses_ES
dc.contributor.authorValtonen, Miaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorVergeer, Philippinees_ES
dc.contributor.authorWeissensteiner, Matthiases_ES
dc.contributor.authorWheat, Christopher W.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorVilà, Carleses_ES
dc.contributor.authorZieliński, Piotres_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T11:08:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-18T11:08:56Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationTrends in Ecology & Evolution 31(2): 83-84 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0169-5347-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/196992-
dc.description.abstractThe letter by Garner et al. [1] continued an important discussion regarding the role genomics might play in conservation biology. In general, we do not see a dichotomy between our point of view [2] and that put forth by Garner et al. [1]. At the heart of the issue is how to define an actual impact of genomics on applied conservation and find suitable ways to remove existing barriers limiting the use of genomics for managing wild populations. The promised gains of identifying adaptive loci and the genes underlying phenotypes 3, 4 have in most systems not yet been realized and recent empirical work further highlights the challenges 5, 6. Thus, our take-home message boiled down to the application of genomics in wild populations being at an early developmental stage that is far from straightforward and far from regularly applied [2].es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.titleReply to Garner et al.es_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.010-
dc.description.peerreviewedNoes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.010es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1872-8383-
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.