English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/195998
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves

AuthorsSazatornil, Víctor; Rodríguez, Alejandro CSIC ORCID ; Klaczek, Michael; Ahmadi, Mohsen; Álvares, Francisco; Arthur, Stepher; Blanco, Juan Carlos; Borg, Bridget L.; Cluff, Dean; Cortés, Yolanda; García, Emilio J.; Geffen, Eli; Habib, Bilal; Iliopoulos, Yorgos; Kaboli, Mohammad Krofel, Miha; Llaneza, Luis; Marucco, Francesca; Oakleaf, John K.; Person, David K.; Potocnik, Hubert; Ražen, Nina; Rio-Maior, Helena; Sand, Hakan; Unger, David; Wabakken, Petter; López-Bao, José Vicente
KeywordsHuman-dominated landscapes
Human-made structures
Continental patterns
Persecution
Persistence
Human population density
Homesites
Large carnivores
Issue DateSep-2016
PublisherElsevier
CitationBiological Conservation 201: 103-110 (2016)
AbstractLarge carnivores can be found in different scenarios of cohabitation with humans. Behavioral adaptations to minimize risk from humans are expected to be exacerbated where large carnivores are most vulnerable, such as at breeding sites. Using wolves as a model species, along with data from 26 study areas across the species' worldwide range, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of humans in breeding site selection by a large carnivore. Some of the patterns previously observed at the local scale become extrapolatable to the entire species range provided that important sources of variation are taken into account. Generally, wolves minimised the risk of exposure at breeding sites by avoiding human-made structures, selecting shelter from vegetation and avoiding agricultural lands. Our results suggest a scaled hierarchical habitat selection process across selection orders by which wolves compensate higher exposure risk to humans within their territories via a stronger selection at breeding sites. Dissimilar patterns between continents suggest that adaptations to cope with human-associated risks are modulated by the history of coexistence and persecution. Although many large carnivores persisting in human-dominated landscapes do not require large-scale habitat preservation, habitat selection at levels below occupancy and territory should be regarded in management and conservation strategies aiming to preserve these species in such contexts. In this case, we recommend providing shelter from human interference at least in small portions of land in order to fulfill the requirements of the species to locate their breeding sites.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.022
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/195998
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.022
ISSN0006-3207
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.