English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/195872
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Temperature drives local contributions to beta diversity in mountain streams: Stochastic and deterministic processes

AuthorsWang, Jianjun; Legendre, Pierre; Soininen, Janne; Yeh, Chih-Fu; Graham, Emily B.; Stegen , James; Casamayor, Emilio O. ; Zhou, Jizhong; Shen, Ji; Pan, Feiyan
Beta diversity
Elevational gradient
Issue Date2019
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationGlobal Ecology and Biogeography : doi:10.1111/geb.13035 (2019)
AbstractAim: Community variation (i.e. beta diversity) along geographical gradients is of substantial interest in ecology and biodiversity reserves in the face of global changes. However, the generality in beta diversity patterns and underlying processes remains less studied across trophic levels and geographical regions. We documented beta diversity patterns and underlying ecological processes of stream bacteria, diatoms and macroinvertebrates along six elevational gradients. Locations: Asia and Europe. Methods: We examined stream communities using molecular and morphological methods. We characterised community uniqueness with local contributions to beta diversity (LCBD), and investigated the drivers of its geographic patterns using Mid- Domain Effect (MDE), coenocline simulation, Raup-Crick null model approach, and through comparisons to environmental factors. MDE is a stochastic model by considering species elevational range, while coenocline simulation is a deterministic model by considering species niche optima and tolerance. The null model provides possible underlying mechanisms of community assembly with the degree to which deterministic processes create communities deviating from those of null expectations. Results: Across all taxa, we revealed a general U-shaped LCBD-elevation relationship, suggesting higher uniqueness of community composition at both elevational ends. This pattern was confirmed and could be explained by both stochastic and deterministic models, that is, MDE and coenocline simulation, respectively, and was supported by the dominance of species replacement. Temperature was the main environmental factor underlying elevational patterns in LCBD. The generalists with broad niche breadths were key in maintaining community uniqueness, and the higher relative importance of deterministic processes resulted in stronger U-shaped patterns regardless of taxonomic group. Conclusions: Our synthesis across both mountains and taxonomic groups clearly shows that there are consistent elevational patterns in LCBD among taxonomic groups, and that these patterns are explained by similar ecological mechanisms, producing a more complete picture for understanding and bridging the spatial variation in biodiversity under changing climate.
DescriptionEste artículo contiene 13 páginas, 5 figuras.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13035
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.