English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/195365
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Irrigation-advisor—a decision support system for irrigation of vegetable crops

AuthorsMiras, Manuel ; Rubio-Asensio, José Salvador; Ramírez-Cuesta, Juan Miguel; Maestre-Valero, José F.; Intrigliolo, Diego S.
KeywordsEvapotranspiration
Modeling
Soil water balance
Water-use efficiency
Weather forecasts
Issue Date26-Oct-2019
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitationWater 11(11): 2245 (2019)
AbstractClimate change will intensify water scarcity, and therefore irrigation must be adapted to save water. Operational tools that provide watering recommendations to end-users are needed. This work presents a new tool, Irrigation-Advisor (IA), which is based on weather forecasts and is able to separately determine soil evaporation and crop transpiration, and thus is adaptable to a broad range of agricultural situations. By calculating several statistical indicators, IA was tested against the FAO-56 crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>c</sub>FAO) methodology using local crop coefficients. Additionally, IA recommendations were compared with current standard practices by experienced farmers (F). Six field experiments with four widely cultivated species (endive, lettuce, muskmelon and potato) were performed in Southeast Spain. Irrigation water applied, crop yield, aboveground biomass and water productivity were determined. Crop water needs underestimations (5%–20%) were detected when comparing IA against ET<sub>c</sub>FAO, although the index of agreement proved reasonable adjustments. The IA recommendations led to water savings up to 13% when compared to F, except for lettuce, with a 31% surplus in irrigation when using IA. Crop yield was not compromised and water productivity was increased by IA. Therefore, IA mimicked the farmers′ irrigation strategies fairly well without deploying sensors on-site. Nevertheless, improvements are needed for increasing the accuracy of IA estimations.
Publisher version (URL)http://doi.org/10.3390/w11112245
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/195365
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11112245
E-ISSN2073-4441
Appears in Collections:(CEBAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
irrigation-advisor_decision_support_system_irrigation_vegetable_crops.pdf1,44 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.