English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/193513
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Serum-derived extracellular vesicles from african swine fever virus-infected pigs selectively recruit viral and porcine proteins

AuthorsMontaner-Tarbes, Sergio; Pujol, Myriam; Jabbar, Tamara; Hawes, Philippa; Chapman, Dave; Portillo, Hernando del; Fraile, Lorenzo; Sánchez-Cordón, Pedro J.; Dixon, Linda; Montoya, María
KeywordsExtracellular vesicles
African swine fever virus
Proteomic analysis
Issue Date20-Sep-2019
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitationViruses 11(10): 882 (2019)
AbstractAfrican swine fever is a devastating hemorrhagic infectious disease, which affects domestic and wild swines (Sus scrofa) of all breeds and ages, with a high lethality of up to 90–100% in naïve animals. The causative agent, African swine fever virus (ASFV), is a large and complex double-stranded DNA arbovirus which is currently spreading worldwide, with serious socioeconomic consequences. There is no treatment or effective vaccine commercially available, and most of the current research is focused on attenuated viral models, with limited success so far. Thus, new strategies are under investigation. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have proven to be a promising new vaccination platform for veterinary diseases in situations in which conventional approaches have not been completely successful. Here, serum extracellular vesicles from infected pigs using two different ASFV viruses (OURT 88/3 and Benin ΔMGF), corresponding to a naturally attenuated virus and a deletion mutant, respectively, were characterized in order to determine possible differences in the content of swine and viral proteins in EV-enriched fractions. Firstly, EVs were characterized by their CD5, CD63, CD81 and CD163 surface expression. Secondly, ASFV proteins were detected on the surface of EVs from ASFV-infected pig serum. Finally, proteomic analysis revealed few specific proteins from ASFV in the EVs, but 942 swine proteins were detected in all EV preparations (negative controls, and OURT 88/3 and Benin ΔMGF-infected preparations). However, in samples from OURT 88/3-infected animals, only a small number of proteins were differentially identified compared to control uninfected animals. Fifty-six swine proteins (Group Benin) and seven proteins (Group OURT 88/3) were differentially detected on EVs when compared to the EV control group. Most of these were related to coagulation cascades. The results presented here could contribute to a better understanding of ASFV pathogenesis and immune/protective responses in the host.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.3390/v11100882
Appears in Collections:(CIB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
viruses-11-00882-v2.pdf2,49 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.