English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/190011
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlonso López, Juan C.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlonso López, Javier A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBautista, Luis M.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T13:33:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-05T13:33:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCranes and agriculture: a global guide for sharing the landscape: 272-279 (2018)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/190011-
dc.descriptionCase Study-
dc.description.abstractEurasian Cranes (Grus grus) started staging at Gallocanta, NE Spain, in 1973, just after waterfowl hunting was prohibited in the lake. Since then, crane numbers increased in the area each year, due to the abundant food resources provided by intensive cereal farming. During the mid-1980s, farmers started claiming compensations for the damages caused by cranes in their fields. A study revealed that the overall damage was negligible but found that in a few fields close to roosting or drinking sites cranes consumed up to 30% of the planted cereal grain. The regional authorities were not able to manage the social alarm appropriately, and farmers started chasing the cranes from fields and roosting sites. These disturbances contributed to a reverse in the increasing crane population trend of the previous decade, and many cranes shifted northwards to winter at new staging areas in France, where they found abundant food in maize (corn [Zea mays]) stubble. Today, a delicate equilibrium has been reached with the provision of compensations through agri-environmental measures within a Rural Development Program funded by the European Union. However, the amount of compensations still continues under strong debate, and the conflict is far from being solved. Compensatory payments do not represent a sustainable solution to the problem because they lead to further social conflicts. To definitely solve them, additional management measures should be evaluated and implemented.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInternational Crane Foundationes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectGrullaes_ES
dc.subjectCranees_ES
dc.subjectGruses_ES
dc.subjectAgriculturaes_ES
dc.titleA review of the crane-agriculture conflict at Gallocanta Lake, Spaines_ES
dc.typecapítulo de libroes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.savingcranes.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/cranes_and_agriculture_web_2018.pdf#page=281es_ES
dc.relation.csicNoes_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.contributor.orcidAlonso López, Juan C. [0000-0003-0450-7434]es_ES
dc.contributor.orcidBautista, Luis M. [0000-0002-1503-652X]es_ES
Appears in Collections:(MNCN) Libros y partes de libros
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alonso CranesAgri p272 2018.pdf4,29 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.