English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/187823
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Controlling factors and implications for travertine and tufa deposition in a volcanic setting

AuthorsRodríguez-Berriguete, Álvaro ; Alonso-Zarza, Ana María
KeywordsTravertine
Tufa
Aragonite
Calcite
BiofilmInorganic CaCO3
Issue Date1-Mar-2019
PublisherElsevier
CitationSedimentary Geology 381: 13-28 (2019)
AbstractThis work studies a fossil system of perched and fluvial travertines passing distally to fluvial tufas within a volcanic ravine. Sedimentology, petrology and geochemistry of fossil aragonitic-calcitic travertines and downstream calcitic tufas from the Azuaje volcanic ravine were studied. These spring-related carbonates seem to be formed after the Mid-Holocene climate change, the transition from a monsoon-dominated humid climate to an arid-semiarid climate controlled by trade winds. The main travertine facies include rafts, dendrites/shrubs, ooids, oncoids and stromatolites among others, whereas tufas are characterised by phytoclasts, oncoids, coated stems, intraclasts and stromatolites. Facies observed can be (i) microbial-influenced when the microbial growth rate is greater than the precipitation rate and flow energy is not above the threshold value tolerated by microbes, or (ii) inorganic-dominated if the precipitation rate exceeds that of the microbial growth rate and/or flow energy is above the threshold tolerated by microbes. Travertine facies vary from mostly inorganic to microbially-dominated, whereas tufa facies are mostly microbially-influenced. Observed changes of facies in both travertines and tufas were interpreted as due to changes in environmental conditions from (a) less to more evaporative, (b) less saturated to oversaturated, and (c) high to low energy. Changes in textures, mineralogy, geochemistry and stable isotope composition downstream from travertine to tufa suggest a decrease in the CaCO3 precipitation rate and an increase in microbial influence from travertines (proximal part of the system) to (distal) tufas. Our study case illustrates the wide variety of facies and processes operating in spring-related travertine and tufa deposits. The details of arrangement, mineralogy, facies and geochemistry of the deposits were mostly controlled by climate and hydrogeology, although the volcanic setting, provided suitable conditions for spring‑carbonate deposition.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2018.12.001
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/187823
DOI10.1016/j.sedgeo.2018.12.001
ISSN0037-0738
Appears in Collections:(IGEO) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.