English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/187631
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain

AuthorsÁlvarez-Bornstein, Belén ; Díaz-Faes, Adrián A. CSIC ORCID ; Bordons, María CSIC ORCID
KeywordsFunding acknowledgements
Scientific impact
Scientific collaboration
Research level
Research funding
Issue Date2019
CitationScientometrics 119: 805–825 (2019)
AbstractImproving our knowledge about funding patterns in different research domains and how funding contributes to research is a matter of great interest for funders and policymakers. This paper aims to (a) compare the funding patterns of two biomedical domains that differ in their basic versus clinical nature, and (b) to elucidate the factors that influence the presence of funding. To do so, we draw on the scientific output of Spain-based researchers in the Virology (basic) and Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (clinical) domains as covered by the Web of Science database. Funding rate, public versus private funding source, and national versus foreign origin of the funds are examined through an analysis of funding acknowledgements in published papers. The relationship between funding and different bibliometric indicators such as impact, collaboration, basic or clinical research level, and authors’ institutional sector is scrutinised. Funded studies tend to have higher impact and are more likely to have foreign partners, findings which are aligned with the objectives pursued by public funding agencies. Clinical research and research done in hospital settings are less likely to be funded. The likelihood of funding increases with the number of institutions in the clinical domain but not in the basic one. Although collaboration is fostered by public research agencies and funding may enhance the establishment of collaborative links among researchers, the likelihood of being funded does not always increase with the number of institutions, because other factors such as the type of institution and the clinical or basic nature of the research have a significant moderating effect.
Publisher version (URL)https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-019-03066-3
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Artículos
(CCHS-IFS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alvarez-Bornstein_postprint.pdf435,29 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.