English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/185982
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoeberechts, Maia-
dc.contributor.authorMatabos, M.-
dc.contributor.authorJuniper, S. Kim-
dc.contributor.authorAguzzi, Jacopo-
dc.contributor.authorBranzan Albu, Alexandra-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T07:27:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-12T07:27:17Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-11-
dc.identifier.citation2018 Ocean Sciences Meeting (2018)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/185982-
dc.description2018 Ocean Sciences Meeting, 11-16 February, in Portland, Oregon-
dc.description.abstractRecent technological development has increased our capacity to study the deep sea and the marine benthic realm, particularly with the development of multidisciplinary seafloor observatories. Since 2006, Ocean Networks Canada cabled observatories, have acquired nearly 65 TB and over 90 000 h of video data from seafloor cameras and remotely operated vehicles. Manual processing of these data is time-consuming and highly labour-intensive, and cannot be comprehensively undertaken by individual researchers. These videos are a crucial source of information for assessing natural variability and ecosystem responses to increasing human activity in the deep sea. We compared the performance of three groups of humans and one computer vision algorithm in counting individuals of the commercially important sablefish (or black cod) Anoplopoma fimbria, in recorded video from a cabled camera platform at 900 m depth in a submarine canyon in the Northeast Pacific. The first group of human observers were untrained volunteers recruited via a crowdsourcing platform and the second were experienced university students, who performed the task for their ichthyology class. Results were validated against counts obtained from a scientific expert. All groups produced relatively accurate results in comparison to the expert and all succeeded in detecting patterns and periodicities in fish abundance data. Trained volunteers displayed the highest accuracy and the algorithm the lowest. As seafloor observatories increase in number around the world, this study demonstrates the value of a hybrid combination of crowdsourcing and computer vision techniques as a tool to help process large volumes of imagery to support basic research and environmental monitoring. Reciprocally, by engaging large numbers of online participants in deep-sea research, this approach can contribute significantly to ocean literacy and informed citizen input to policy development-
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union-
dc.publisherAssociation for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.titleExpert, Crowd, Students or Algorithm: who holds the key to deep-sea imagery ‘big data’ processing?-
dc.typecomunicación de congreso-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://agu.confex.com/agu/os18/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/325519-
dc.date.updated2019-07-12T07:27:18Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.relation.csic-
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.