Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/183124
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Multi-residue determination of 47 organic compounds in water, soil, sediment and fish—Turia River as case study

AutorCarmona, Eric CSIC ORCID; Andreu Pérez, V. CSIC ORCID ; Picó, Yolanda CSIC ORCID
Palabras clavePharmaceuticals
Personal care products
Drugs of abuse
Plasticizers
Extraction
LC–MS/MS
Fecha de publicación30-nov-2017
EditorElsevier
CitaciónJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 146: 117-125 (2017)
ResumenA sensitive and reliable method based on solid-liquid extraction (SLE) using McIlvaine-Na2EDTA buffer (pH = 4.5)-methanol and solid-phase extraction (SPE) clean up prior to ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS) was applied to determine 47 organic contaminants in fish, soil and sediments. The SPE procedure to clean-up the extracts was also used as extraction method to determine these compounds in water. Recoveries ranged from 38 to 104% for all matrices with RSDs < 30%. Limits of Quantification for the target compounds were in the range of 10–50 ng/g for soil, 2–40 ng/g for sediment, 5–30 ng/g for fish and 0.3–26 ng/L for water. Furthermore, the proposed method was compared to QuEChERS (widely used for environmental matrices) that involves extraction with buffered acetonitrile (pH 5.5) and dispersive SPE clean-up. The results obtained (recoveries>50% for 36 compounds in front of 9, matrix effect < 20% for 31 compounds against 21, and LOQs <25 ng g−1 for 38 compounds against 22) indicates that the proposed method is more efficient than QuEChERS, The method was applied to monitoring these compounds along the Turia River. In river waters, Paracetamol (175 ng L−1), ibuprofen (153 ng L−1) and bisphenol A (41 ng L−1) were the compounds most frequently detected while in sediments were vildagliptin (7 ng g−1) and metoprolol (31 ng g−1) and in fish, bisphenol A (33 ng g−1) or sulfamethoxazole (13 ng g−1).
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.014
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/183124
DOI10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.014
ISSN0304-3894
E-ISSN1873-3336
Aparece en las colecciones: (CIDE) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,35 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

70
checked on 09-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

67
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

172
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

35
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.