Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Trees as habitat islands: Temporal variation in alpha and beta diversity in epiphytic laurel forest bryophyte communities

AuthorsPatiño, Jairo CSIC ORCID ; Gómez-Rodríguez, Carola CSIC ORCID; Pupo-Correia, Aida; Sequeira, Miguel; Vanderpoorten, Alain
Species turnover
Beta diversity
Laurel forest
Issue Date1-Jun-2018
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationJournal of Biogeography 45(8): 1727-1738 (2018)
Abstract[Aim] Trees represent striking examples of habitat islands, with various degrees of spatial isolation and evolving properties during their life cycle. Here, we investigate whether changes in habitat conditions, dispersal limitations or competition cause variation in patterns of epiphytic species richness and turnover. [Location] Madeira island. [Taxon] Bryophytes. Methods: Using linear mixed effect models, we test whether species richness exhibits a monotonic or hump-shaped relationship with time. Two groups of host-tree species, late- and early-successional, were considered. We further identify the mechanisms explaining the observed variation in species composition by dividing beta diversity into its nestedness (β) and turnover (β) components and correlating them with tree age and geographical distance among trees. [Results] The best-fit models all included tree age (T), but its quadratic term (T) and tree height (H, here a surrogate of area) were not systematically included. β, but not β, correlated with host-tree age, and both β and β correlated with geographical distance. [Main conclusions] Tree age was consistently included in all of the best-fit models, reflecting the progressive increase in epiphyte bryophyte species richness through time. The limited contribution of T and H to the best models suggests that competition for space is not a key factor on mature trees. The correlation of β, but not β, with host-tree age, and of β and β with distance among trees, suggests that variation in species composition is caused by (1) temporal community shifts due to allogenic drivers and (2) dispersal limitations, which are reflected by the higher similarity of the epiphyte communities on clustered trees rather than by an increasing probability of colonization with tree age. Since actual ancient laurel forests may no longer exist in Madeira, the conservation of clusters of late-successional trees, enhancing connectivity at small spatial scales, is of utmost importance for the conservation and recovery of the unique laurel forest epiphytic flora.
Publisher version (URL)
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/jbi.13359
e-issn: 1365-2699
issn: 0305-0270
Appears in Collections:(IPNA) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work


checked on Feb 28, 2024


checked on Feb 26, 2024

Page view(s)

checked on Mar 2, 2024


checked on Mar 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM




WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.