Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/178698
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding |
Autor: | Ji, Yinqiu; Ashton, Louise; Pedley, Scott M.; Edwards, David P.; Tang, Yong; Nakamura, Akihiro; Kitching, Roger; Dolman, Paul M.; Woodcock, Paul; Edwards, Felicity A.; Larsen, Trond H.; Hsu, Wayne W.; Benedick, Suzan; Hamer, Keith C.; Wilcove, David S.; Bruce, Catharine; Wang, Xiaoyang; Levi, Taal; Lott, Martin; Emerson, Brent C. CSIC ORCID ; Yu, Douglas W. | Palabras clave: | Biodiversity Tropical forest Targeted monitoring Systematic conservation planning Surveillance monitoring Restoration ecology Climate change DNA barcoding Heathland |
Fecha de publicación: | 4-ago-2013 | Editor: | Blackwell Publishing | Citación: | Ecology Letters 16: 1245-1257 (2013) | Resumen: | To manage and conserve biodiversity, one must know what is being lost, where, and why, as well as which remedies are likely to be most effective. Metabarcoding technology can characterise the species compositions of mass samples of eukaryotes or of environmental DNA. Here, we validate metabarcoding by testing it against three high‐quality standard data sets that were collected in Malaysia (tropical), China (subtropical) and the United Kingdom (temperate) and that comprised 55,813 arthropod and bird specimens identified to species level with the expenditure of 2,505 person‐hours of taxonomic expertise. The metabarcode and standard data sets exhibit statistically correlated alpha‐ and beta‐diversities, and the two data sets produce similar policy conclusions for two conservation applications: restoration ecology and systematic conservation planning. Compared with standard biodiversity data sets, metabarcoded samples are taxonomically more comprehensive, many times quicker to produce, less reliant on taxonomic expertise and auditable by third parties, which is essential for dispute resolution. | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12162 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/178698 | DOI: | 10.1111/ele.12162 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1111/ele.12162 issn: 1461-023X e-issn: 1461-0248 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IPNA) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliable_Ji_2013.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
455
checked on 19-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
400
checked on 23-feb-2024
Page view(s)
250
checked on 24-abr-2024
Download(s)
162
checked on 24-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.