English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/177825
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals

AuthorsMargalida, Antoni ; Colomer, Mª Àngels
KeywordsBibliometric analyses
Corrections
Mistake index
Peer review
Publishing
Issue Date2016
PublisherPeerJ
CitationPeerJ 4: e1670 (2016)
AbstractWe apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of corrections published in these three high-quality journals. The index appears to be independent of the journal impact factor or the number of items published, as suggested by a comparative analyses among 16 top scientific journals of different impact factors and disciplines. A more detailed analysis suggests that the trend in the time-to-correction increased significantly over time and also differed among journals (Nature 233 days; Science 136 days; PNAS 232 days). A detailed review of 1,428 errors showed that 60% of corrections were related to figures, authors, references or results. According to the three categories established, 34.7% of the corrections were considered mild, 47.7% moderate and 17.6% severe, also differing among journals. Errors occurring during the printing process were responsible for 5% of corrections in Nature, 3% in Science and 18% in PNAS. The measurement of the temporal trends in the quality of scientific manuscripts can assist editors and reviewers in identifying the most common mistakes, increasing the rigor of peer-review and improving the quality of published scientific manuscripts.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1670
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/177825
DOI10.7717/peerj.1670
E-ISSN2167-8359
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
improvijournal.pdf1,75 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.